Unlearning Clients, Features and Samples in Vertical Federated Learning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a prominent distributed learning paradigm. Within the scope of privacy preservation, information privacy regulations such as GDPR entitle users to request the removal (or unlearning) of their contribution from a service that is hosting the model. For this purpose, a server hosting an ML model must be able to unlearn certain information in cases such as copyright infringement or security issues that can make the model vulnerable or impact the performance of a service based on that model. While most unlearning approaches in FL focus on Horizontal FL (HFL), where clients share the feature space and the global model, Vertical FL (VFL) has received less attention from the research community. VFL involves clients (passive parties) sharing the sample space among them while not having access to the labels. In this paper, we explore unlearning in VFL from three perspectives: unlearning clients, unlearning features, and unlearning samples. To unlearn clients and features we introduce VFU-KD which is based on knowledge distillation (KD) while to unlearn samples, VFU-GA is introduced which is based on gradient ascent. To provide evidence of approximate unlearning, we utilize Membership Inference Attack (MIA) to audit the effectiveness of our unlearning approach. Our experiments across six tabular datasets and two image datasets demonstrate that VFU-KD and VFU-GA achieve performance comparable to or better than both retraining from scratch and the benchmark R2S method in many cases, with improvements of (0-2%). In the remaining cases, utility scores remain comparable, with a modest utility loss ranging from 1-5%. Unlike existing methods, VFU-KD and VFU-GA require no communication between active and passive parties during unlearning. However, they do require the active party to store the previously communicated embeddings.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2025.
Builds on
16 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 15
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
- 2019A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protectioncited by 371
- 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
- 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearningcited by 274
- 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labelscited by 223
- 2022Vertical Federated Learning: Challenges, Methodologies and Experimentscited by 55
3 more
- 2020A Vertical Federated Learning Method for Interpretable Scorecard and Its Application in Credit Scoringcited by 16
- 2024Federated Transformer: Multi-Party Vertical Federated Learning on Practical Fuzzily Linked Datacited by 8
- 2024Communication-Efficient Hybrid Federated Learning for E-health with Horizontal and Vertical Data Partitioningcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Certifying the Right to Be Forgotten: Primal-Dual Optimization for Sample and Label Unlearning in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2025From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.0cited by 0
- 2026Do Vision Models Truly Forget? New Findings from Representation-Level Certification of Visual Unlearning in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026Do Vision Models Truly Forget? New Findings from Representation-Level Certification of Visual Unlearning in Vertical Federated Learning19 May 2026
- 2025Certifying the Right to Be Forgotten: Primal-Dual Optimization for Sample and Label Unlearning in Vertical Federated Learning29 Dec 2025
- 2025From Privacy to Trust in the Agentic Era: A Taxonomy of Challenges in Trustworthy Federated Learning Through the Lens of Trust Report 2.021 Jul 2025