The Journey Matters: Average Parameter Count over Pre-training Unifies Sparse and Dense Scaling Laws
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pruning eliminates unnecessary parameters in neural networks; it offers a promising solution to the growing computational demands of large language models (LLMs). While many focus on post-training pruning, sparse pre-training--which combines pruning and pre-training into a single phase--provides a simpler alternative. In this work, we present the first systematic exploration of optimal sparse pre-training configurations for LLMs through an examination of 80 unique pruning schedules across different sparsity levels and training durations. We find that initiating pruning at 25% of total training compute and concluding at 75% achieves near-optimal final evaluation loss. These findings provide valuable insights for efficient and effective sparse pre-training of LLMs. Furthermore, we propose a new scaling law that modifies the Chinchilla scaling law to use the average parameter count over pre-training. Through empirical and theoretical validation, we demonstrate that this modified scaling law accurately models evaluation loss for both sparsely and densely pre-trained LLMs, unifying scaling laws across pre-training paradigms. Our findings indicate that while sparse pre-training achieves the same final model quality as dense pre-training for equivalent compute budgets, it provides substantial benefits through reduced model size, enabling significant potential computational savings during inference.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2025.
Builds on
33 of 44 references.
References · 33
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
- 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 697
21 more
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 599
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
- 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 491
- 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
- 2023Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruningcited by 408
- 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 238
- 2023Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling Lawscited by 155
- 2021Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2021AC/DC: Alternating Compressed/DeCompressed Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 58
- 2022Data Scaling Laws in NMT: The Effect of Noise and Architecturecited by 55
- 2023Scaling Laws for Sparsely-Connected Foundation Modelscited by 41
- 2022Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?cited by 38
- 2020On the Predictability of Pruning Across Scalescited by 33
- 2023Masked Structural Growth for 2x Faster Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 32
- 2022Pruning's Effect on Generalization Through the Lens of Training and Regularizationcited by 31
- 2023STEP: Learning N:M Structured Sparsity Masks from Scratch with Preconditioncited by 25
- 2024Progressive Gradient Flow for Robust N:M Sparsity Training in Transformerscited by 17
- 2023Accurate Neural Network Pruning Requires Rethinking Sparse Optimizationcited by 10
- 2024Efficient Stagewise Pretraining via Progressive Subnetworkscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.