mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Journey Matters: Average Parameter Count over Pre-training Unifies Sparse and Dense Scaling Laws

arXiv 2501.12486 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2025cs.LG cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pruning eliminates unnecessary parameters in neural networks; it offers a promising solution to the growing computational demands of large language models (LLMs). While many focus on post-training pruning, sparse pre-training--which combines pruning and pre-training into a single phase--provides a simpler alternative. In this work, we present the first systematic exploration of optimal sparse pre-training configurations for LLMs through an examination of 80 unique pruning schedules across different sparsity levels and training durations. We find that initiating pruning at 25% of total training compute and concluding at 75% achieves near-optimal final evaluation loss. These findings provide valuable insights for efficient and effective sparse pre-training of LLMs. Furthermore, we propose a new scaling law that modifies the Chinchilla scaling law to use the average parameter count over pre-training. Through empirical and theoretical validation, we demonstrate that this modified scaling law accurately models evaluation loss for both sparsely and densely pre-trained LLMs, unifying scaling laws across pre-training paradigms. Our findings indicate that while sparse pre-training achieves the same final model quality as dense pre-training for equivalent compute budgets, it provides substantial benefits through reduced model size, enabling significant potential computational savings during inference.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2025.

Builds on

33 of 44 references.

References · 33

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  5. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  6. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  7. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  8. 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
  9. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  10. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
  11. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
  12. 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 697
21 more
  1. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  2. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
  3. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 599
  4. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
  5. 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 491
  6. 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
  7. 2023Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruningcited by 408
  8. 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 238
  9. 2023Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling Lawscited by 155
  10. 2021Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
  11. 2021AC/DC: Alternating Compressed/DeCompressed Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 58
  12. 2022Data Scaling Laws in NMT: The Effect of Noise and Architecturecited by 55
  13. 2023Scaling Laws for Sparsely-Connected Foundation Modelscited by 41
  14. 2022Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?cited by 38
  15. 2020On the Predictability of Pruning Across Scalescited by 33
  16. 2023Masked Structural Growth for 2x Faster Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 32
  17. 2022Pruning's Effect on Generalization Through the Lens of Training and Regularizationcited by 31
  18. 2023STEP: Learning N:M Structured Sparsity Masks from Scratch with Preconditioncited by 25
  19. 2024Progressive Gradient Flow for Robust N:M Sparsity Training in Transformerscited by 17
  20. 2023Accurate Neural Network Pruning Requires Rethinking Sparse Optimizationcited by 10
  21. 2024Efficient Stagewise Pretraining via Progressive Subnetworkscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.