mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visualizing definitional divergence in high-dimensional data by manifold alignment: Application to 3D right ventricular strain computations

arXiv 2501.12178 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Medical imaging studies often rely on a single sample per subject, assuming it is representative of their physiological traits. However, variations in how input descriptors are defined or computed (e.g. due to a lack of consensus in the scientific field) may have a crucial impact on the analysis, and are hardly considered in practice. In this paper, we propose an original strategy based on representation learning to estimate a parametric map reflecting the impact of such definitional differences on a given physiological descriptor, previously extracted from medical images. We consider the different definitions or computations of such physiological descriptors as different high-dimensional data, potentially of heterogeneous types. We specifically focus on myocardial deformation (strain), for which there is limited agreement on its definition. We first use manifold alignment to match the latent representations associated with the different definitions of this descriptor. Then, we formulate plausible distributions in the latent space to represent definitional divergence across descriptors, from which we reconstruct a high-dimensional parametric map to visualize such definitional divergence. Due to the lack of proper ground truth for this specific clinical application, we first demonstrate this methodology on toy experiments and then expand the evaluation on right ventricular strain data from subjects obtained from 3D echocardiographic image sequences, for which different types of strain are available at each point of the right ventricle endocardial surface mesh. Beyond this illustrative application, our methodology has the potential to be generalised to many other population analyses considering heterogeneous high-dimensional descriptors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2025.

Builds on

11 of 49 references.

References · 11

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  3. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
  4. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,004
  5. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  6. 2022Multimodal Learning with Transformers: A Surveycited by 399
  7. 2020Keystroke Dynamics as Part of Lifeloggingcited by 334
  8. 2018Generating 3D faces using Convolutional Mesh Autoencoderscited by 267
  9. 2022A survey of unsupervised learning methods for high-dimensional uncertainty quantification in black-box-type problemscited by 20
  10. 2022CRISP - Reliable Uncertainty Estimation for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 10
  11. 2018A rule-based method to model myocardial fiber orientation in cardiac biventricular geometries with outflow tractscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.