Jailbreaking Large Language Models in Infinitely Many Ways
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
We discuss the ``Infinitely Many Paraphrases'' attacks (IMP), a category of jailbreaks that leverages the increasing capabilities of a model to handle paraphrases and encoded communications to bypass their defensive mechanisms. IMPs' viability pairs and grows with a model's capabilities to handle and bind the semantics of simple mappings between tokens and work extremely well in practice, posing a concrete threat to the users of the most powerful LLMs in commerce. We show how one can bypass the safeguards of the most powerful open- and closed-source LLMs and generate content that explicitly violates their safety policies. One can protect against IMPs by improving the guardrails and making them scale with the LLMs' capabilities. For two categories of attacks that are straightforward to implement, i.e., bijection and encoding, we discuss two defensive strategies, one in token and the other in embedding space. We conclude with some research questions we believe should be prioritised to enhance the defensive mechanisms of LLMs and our understanding of their safety.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2025.
Builds on
22 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2024A Cross-Language Investigation into Jailbreak Attacks in Large Language Models30 Jan
- 2023Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations10 Oct
- 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
- 2023Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-43 Oct
- 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
- 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Prompts7 Jun
Other references · 15
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
- 2019Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 168
- 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspective
- 2024Towards Understanding Jailbreak Attacks in LLMs: A Representation Space Analysis
- 2024SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding
- 2024A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models
- 2025A Domain-Based Taxonomy of Jailbreak Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models
- 2024Jailbreak Antidote: Runtime Safety-Utility Balance via Sparse Representation Adjustment in Large Language Models
- 2025Harmful Prompt Laundering: Jailbreaking LLMs with Abductive Styles and Symbolic Encoding
- 2024Jailbreaking Large Language Models Through Alignment Vulnerabilities in Out-of-Distribution Settings