AI/ML Based Detection and Categorization of Covert Communication in IPv6 Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The flexibility and complexity of IPv6 extension headers allow attackers to create covert channels or bypass security mechanisms, leading to potential data breaches or system compromises. The mature development of machine learning has become the primary detection technology option used to mitigate covert communication threats. However, the complexity of detecting covert communication, evolving injection techniques, and scarcity of data make building machine-learning models challenging. In previous related research, machine learning has shown good performance in detecting covert communications, but oversimplified attack scenario assumptions cannot represent the complexity of modern covert technologies and make it easier for machine learning models to detect covert communications. To bridge this gap, in this study, we analyzed the packet structure and network traffic behavior of IPv6, used encryption algorithms, and performed covert communication injection without changing network packet behavior to get closer to real attack scenarios. In addition to analyzing and injecting methods for covert communications, this study also uses comprehensive machine learning techniques to train the model proposed in this study to detect threats, including traditional decision trees such as random forests and gradient boosting, as well as complex neural network architectures such as CNNs and LSTMs, to achieve detection accuracy of over 90%. This study details the methods used for dataset augmentation and the comparative performance of the applied models, reinforcing insights into the adaptability and resilience of the machine learning application in IPv6 covert communication. We further introduce a Generative AI-driven script refinement framework, leveraging prompt engineering as a preliminary exploration of how generative agents can assist in covert communication detection and model enhancement.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2025.
Builds on
2 of 48 references.
References · 2
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 988
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026AICCE: AI Driven Compliance Checker Enginecited by 0
- 2026AICCE: AI Driven Compliance Checker Engine3 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Identifying Appropriate Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Models: A Systematization of Watermarking, Fingerprinting, Model Access, and Attacks
- 2026From Detection to Response: A Deep Learning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Network Intrusion Mitigation
- 2022Robustness Evaluation of Deep Unsupervised Learning Algorithms for Intrusion Detection Systems
- 2025Investigating cybersecurity incidents using large language models in latest-generation wireless networks
- 2026Latent Diffusion for Internet of Things Attack Data Generation in Intrusion Detection
- 2024A Review of the Duality of Adversarial Learning in Network Intrusion: Attacks and Countermeasures ↗
- 2026Robustness Analysis of Machine Learning Models for IoT Intrusion Detection Under Data Poisoning Attacks
- 2024Unraveling Attacks in Machine Learning-based IoT Ecosystems: A Survey and the Open Libraries Behind Them