mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Survey on Responsible LLMs: Inherent Risk, Malicious Use, and Mitigation Strategy

arXiv 2501.09431 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2025cs.AI cs.CL cs.CRcited by 20

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

While large language models (LLMs) present significant potential for supporting numerous real-world applications and delivering positive social impacts, they still face significant challenges in terms of the inherent risk of privacy leakage, hallucinated outputs, and value misalignment, and can be maliciously used for generating toxic content and unethical purposes after been jailbroken. Therefore, in this survey, we present a comprehensive review of recent advancements aimed at mitigating these issues, organized across the four phases of LLM development and usage: data collecting and pre-training, fine-tuning and alignment, prompting and reasoning, and post-processing and auditing. We elaborate on the recent advances for enhancing the performance of LLMs in terms of privacy protection, hallucination reduction, value alignment, toxicity elimination, and jailbreak defenses. In contrast to previous surveys that focus on a single dimension of responsible LLMs, this survey presents a unified framework that encompasses these diverse dimensions, providing a comprehensive view of enhancing LLMs to better serve real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 12; 2026: 8.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025CultureGuard: Towards Culturally-Aware Dataset and Guard Model for Multilingual Safety Applicationscited by 24
  2. 2025Understanding How Value Neurons Shape the Generation of Specified Values in LLMscited by 13
  3. 2025Robustness in Large Language Models: A Survey of Mitigation Strategies and Evaluation Metricscited by 12
  4. 2025What Large Language Models Do Not Talk About: An Empirical Study of Moderation and Censorship Practicescited by 11
  5. 2025IMPersona: Evaluating Individual Level LM Impersonationcited by 11
  6. 2025A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomycited by 9
  7. 2026LLM Agents in Law: Taxonomy, Applications, and Challengescited by 5
  8. 2025Membership Inference Risks in Quantized Models: A Theoretical and Empirical Studycited by 3
  9. 2025Localizing Persona Representations in LLMscited by 3
  10. 2026Controllable Value Alignment in Large Language Models through Neuron-Level Editingcited by 3
  11. 2025Benchmarking Chinese Medical LLMs: A Medbench-based Analysis of Performance Gaps and Hierarchical Optimization Strategiescited by 2
  12. 2025Designing Synthetic Discussion Generation Systems: A Case Study for Online Facilitationcited by 2
8 more
  1. 2026Harm in AI-Driven Societies: An Audit of Toxicity Adoption on Chirper.aicited by 1
  2. 2026When AI Fails, What Works? A Data-Driven Taxonomy of Real-World AI Risk Mitigation Strategiescited by 1
  3. 2025ALHD: A Large-Scale and Multigenre Benchmark Dataset for Arabic LLM-Generated Text Detectioncited by 0
  4. 2025From Craft to Constitution: A Governance-First Paradigm for Principled Agent Engineeringcited by 0
  5. 2026Hiding in Plain Text: Detecting Concealed Jailbreaks via Activation Disentanglementcited by 0
  6. 2026Evolving Jailbreaks: Automated Multi-Objective Long-Tail Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 0
  7. 2026Are LLMs ready for HardChoices?cited by 0
  8. 2026From Memory to Behavior: A Behavior-Aware Role-Playing Framework for Social Media Influencerscited by 0