A Partial Initialization Strategy to Mitigate the Overfitting Problem in CATE Estimation with Hidden Confounding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) from observational data plays a crucial role in areas such as e-commerce, healthcare, and economics. Existing studies mainly rely on the strong ignorability assumption that there are no hidden confounders, whose existence cannot be tested from observational data and can invalidate any causal conclusion. In contrast, data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCT) do not suffer from confounding but are usually limited by a small sample size. To avoid overfitting caused by the small-scale RCT data, we propose a novel two-stage pretraining-finetuning (TSPF) framework with a partial parameter initialization strategy to estimate the CATE in the presence of hidden confounding. In the first stage, a foundational representation of covariates is trained to estimate counterfactual outcomes through large-scale observational data. In the second stage, we propose to train an augmented representation of the covariates, which is concatenated with the foundational representation obtained in the first stage to adjust for the hidden confounding. Rather than training a separate network from scratch, part of the prediction heads are initialized from the first stage. The superiority of our approach is validated on two datasets with extensive experiments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2025.
Builds on
14 of 44 references.
References · 14
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
- 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 408
- 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 327
- 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 285
- 2020CLUB: A Contrastive Log-ratio Upper Bound of Mutual Informationcited by 233
- 2018Removing Hidden Confounding by Experimental Groundingcited by 64
- 2020Causal inference methods for combining randomized trials and observational studies: a reviewcited by 50
- 2022Combining Observational and Randomized Data for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 32
- 2021Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confoundingcited by 28
- 2022On the Opportunity of Causal Learning in Recommendation Systems: Foundation, Estimation, Prediction and Challengescited by 28
- 2023Balancing Unobserved Confounding with a Few Unbiased Ratings in Debiased Recommendationscited by 18
- 2021A tutorial on individualized treatment effect prediction from randomized trials with a binary endpointcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.