Inferring Interpretable Models of Fragmentation Functions using Symbolic Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning is rapidly making its path into natural sciences, including high-energy physics. We present the first study that infers, directly from experimental data, a functional form of fragmentation functions. The latter represent a key ingredient to describe physical observables measured in high-energy physics processes that involve hadron production, and predict their values at different energy. Fragmentation functions can not be calculated in theory and have to be determined instead from data. Traditional approaches rely on global fits of experimental data using a pre-assumed functional form inspired from phenomenological models to learn its parameters. This novel approach uses a ML technique, namely symbolic regression, to learn an analytical model from measured charged hadron multiplicities. The function learned by symbolic regression resembles the Lund string function and describes the data well, thus representing a potential candidate for use in global FFs fits. This study represents an approach to follow in such QCD-related phenomenology studies and more generally in sciences.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2025.
Builds on
9 of 42 references.
References · 9
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2018Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networkcited by 420
- 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
- 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
- 2022Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learningcited by 71
- 2022Symbolic Regression is NP-hardcited by 71
- 2023Symbolic Regression on FPGAs for Fast Machine Learning Inferencecited by 9
- 2024Is machine learning good or bad for the natural sciences?cited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.