Resource Allocation under the Latin Square Constraint
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A Latin square is an n × n matrix filled with n distinct symbols, each of which appears exactly once in each row and exactly once in each column. We introduce a problem of allocating n indivisible items among n agents over n rounds while satisfying the Latin square constraint. This constraint ensures that each agent receives no more than one item per round and receives each item at most once. Each agent has an additive valuation on the item--round pairs. Real-world applications like scheduling, resource management, and experimental design require the Latin square constraint to satisfy fairness or balancedness in allocation. Our goal is to find a partial or complete allocation that maximizes the sum of the agents' valuations (utilitarian social welfare) or the minimum of the agents' valuations (egalitarian social welfare). For the problem of maximizing utilitarian social welfare, we prove NP-hardness even when the valuations are binary additive. We then provide (1-1/e) and (1-1/e)/4-approximation algorithms for partial and complete settings, respectively. Additionally, we present fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms with respect to the order of Latin square and the optimum value for both partial and complete settings. For the problem of maximizing egalitarian social welfare, we establish that deciding whether the optimum value is at most 1 or at least 2 is NP-hard for both the partial and complete settings, even when the valuations are binary. Furthermore, we demonstrate that checking the existence of a complete allocation that satisfies each of envy-free, proportional, equitable, envy-free up to any good, proportional up to any good, or equitable up to any good is NP-hard, even when the valuations are identical.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2025.
Builds on
10 of 68 references.
References · 10
- 2017Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuationscited by 22
- 2023Repeated Fair Allocation of Indivisible Itemscited by 11
- 2017Democratic Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goodscited by 8
- 2022Repeatedly Matching Items to Agents Fairly and Efficientlycited by 8
- 2016A Discrete and Bounded Envy-Free Cake Cutting Protocol for Any Number of Agentscited by 7
- 2020Fair Division of Time: Multi-layered Cake Cuttingcited by 4
- 2021Envy-free division of multi-layered cakescited by 4
- 2022Resource Sharing Through Multi-Round Matchingscited by 4
- 2019Contiguous Cake Cutting: Hardness Results and Approximation Algorithmscited by 3
- 2015Fair and Square: Cake-Cutting in Two Dimensionscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.