mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards a Probabilistic Framework for Analyzing and Improving LLM-Enabled Software

arXiv 2501.06370 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2025cs.SE cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring the reliability and verifiability of large language model (LLM)-enabled systems remains a significant challenge in software engineering. We propose a probabilistic framework for systematically analyzing and improving these systems by modeling and refining distributions over clusters of semantically equivalent outputs. This framework facilitates the evaluation and iterative improvement of Transference Models--key software components that utilize LLMs to transform inputs into outputs for downstream tasks. To illustrate its utility, we apply the framework to the autoformalization problem, where natural language documentation is transformed into formal program specifications. Our case illustrates how distribution-aware analysis enables the identification of weaknesses and guides focused alignment improvements, resulting in more reliable and interpretable outputs. This principled approach offers a foundation for addressing critical challenges in the development of robust LLM-enabled systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2025.

Builds on

13 of 23 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  6. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  7. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,054
  8. 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 256
  9. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 207
  10. 2022On Decoding Strategies for Neural Text Generatorscited by 89
  11. 2023Clover: Closed-Loop Verifiable Code Generationcited by 62
  12. 2023Increasing Probability Mass on Answer Choices Does Not Always Improve Accuracycited by 11
1 more
  1. 2024Generative transformations and patterns in LLM-native approaches for software verification and falsificationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.