mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AgoraSpeech: A multi-annotated comprehensive dataset of political discourse through the lens of humans and AI

arXiv 2501.06265 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Political discourse datasets are important for gaining political insights, analyzing communication strategies or social science phenomena. Although numerous political discourse corpora exist, comprehensive, high-quality, annotated datasets are scarce. This is largely due to the substantial manual effort, multidisciplinarity, and expertise required for the nuanced annotation of rhetorical strategies and ideological contexts. In this paper, we present AgoraSpeech, a meticulously curated, high-quality dataset of 171 political speeches from six parties during the Greek national elections in 2023. The dataset includes annotations (per paragraph) for six natural language processing (NLP) tasks: text classification, topic identification, sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, polarization and populism detection. A two-step annotation was employed, starting with ChatGPT-generated annotations and followed by exhaustive human-in-the-loop validation. The dataset was initially used in a case study to provide insights during the pre-election period. However, it has general applicability by serving as a rich source of information for political and social scientists, journalists, or data scientists, while it can be used for benchmarking and fine-tuning NLP and large language models (LLMs).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2025.

Builds on

14 of 36 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  3. 2020Domain-Specific Language Model Pretraining for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 996
  4. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
  5. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  6. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  7. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 447
  8. 2017Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series datacited by 287
  9. 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
  10. 2023CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotationcited by 93
  11. 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 88
  12. 2020#Election2020: The First Public Twitter Dataset on the 2020 US Presidential Electioncited by 17
2 more
  1. 2024Sampled Datasets Risk Substantial Bias in the Identification of Political Polarization on Social Mediacited by 1
  2. 2024Towards Hybrid Intelligence in Journalism: Findings and Lessons Learnt from a Collaborative Analysis of Greek Political Rhetoric by ChatGPT and Humanscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.