Retrieval-Augmented Generation by Evidence Retroactivity in LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval-augmented generation has gained significant attention due to its ability to integrate relevant external knowledge, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the LLMs' responses. Most of the existing methods apply a dynamic multiple retrieval-generating process, to address multi-hop complex questions by decomposing them into sub-problems. However, these methods rely on an unidirectional forward reasoning paradigm, where errors from insufficient reasoning steps or inherent flaws in current retrieval systems are irreversible, potentially derailing the entire reasoning chain. For the first time, this work introduces Retroactive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RetroRAG), a novel framework to build a retroactive reasoning paradigm. RetroRAG revises and updates the evidence, redirecting the reasoning chain to the correct direction. RetroRAG constructs an evidence-collation-discovery framework to search, generate, and refine credible evidence. It synthesizes inferential evidence related to the key entities in the question from the existing source knowledge and formulates search queries to uncover additional information. As new evidence is found, RetroRAG continually updates and organizes this information, enhancing its ability to locate further necessary evidence. Paired with an Answerer to generate and evaluate outputs, RetroRAG is capable of refining its reasoning process iteratively until a reliable answer is obtained. Empirical evaluations show that RetroRAG significantly outperforms existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2025.
Builds on
15 of 47 references.
References · 15
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 656
- 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 219
- 2024Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 187
- 2023Chain-of-Note: Enhancing Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 180
- 2022Rethinking with Retrieval: Faithful Large Language Model Inferencecited by 145
- 2023Self-contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and Mitigationcited by 123
- 2024ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidencecited by 109
- 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 83
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Stateful Evidence-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Iterative Reasoning
- 2026Assessing the Downstream Utility of Evidence-Aware Retrieval in RAG
- 2026PruneRAG: Confidence-Guided Query Decomposition Trees for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025FAIR-RAG: Faithful Adaptive Iterative Refinement for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2026Stale-Document Poisoning: When Outdated Retrieval Overrides Correct Model Answers
- 2026Hypothesis-Conditioned Query Rewriting for Decision-Useful Retrieval
- 2026ReliableRAG: Combating Misinformation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Reliability-Guided Reasoning Chains
- 2026Facet-Level Tracing of Evidence Uncertainty and Hallucination in RAG