Classifier-Guided Captioning Across Modalities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most current captioning systems use language models trained on data from specific settings, such as image-based captioning via Amazon Mechanical Turk, limiting their ability to generalize to other modality distributions and contexts. This limitation hinders performance in tasks like audio or video captioning, where different semantic cues are needed. Addressing this challenge is crucial for creating more adaptable and versatile captioning frameworks applicable across diverse real-world contexts. In this work, we introduce a method to adapt captioning networks to the semantics of alternative settings, such as capturing audibility in audio captioning, where it is crucial to describe sounds and their sources. Our framework consists of two main components: (i) a frozen captioning system incorporating a language model (LM), and (ii) a text classifier that guides the captioning system. The classifier is trained on a dataset automatically generated by GPT-4, using tailored prompts specifically designed to enhance key aspects of the generated captions. Importantly, the framework operates solely during inference, eliminating the need for further training of the underlying captioning model. We evaluate the framework on various models and modalities, with a focus on audio captioning, and report promising results. Notably, when combined with an existing zero-shot audio captioning system, our framework improves its quality and sets state-of-the-art performance in zero-shot audio captioning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2025.
Builds on
24 of 32 references.
References · 24
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
- 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
- 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
- 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
- 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
- 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 557
12 more
- 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
- 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 483
- 2019Clotho: An Audio Captioning Datasetcited by 354
- 2016Image Captioning with Semantic Attentioncited by 260
- 2021ZeroCap: Zero-Shot Image-to-Text Generation for Visual-Semantic Arithmeticcited by 150
- 2023Prefix tuning for automated audio captioningcited by 26
- 2023RECAP: Retrieval-Augmented Audio Captioningcited by 26
- 2019Audio Caption: Listen and Tellcited by 20
- 2023Training Audio Captioning Models without Audiocited by 12
- 2023Zero-shot audio captioning with audio-language model guidance and audio context keywordscited by 11
- 2023Weakly-supervised Automated Audio Captioning via text only trainingcited by 8
- 2024Zero-Shot Audio Captioning Using Soft and Hard Promptscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.