mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting Explainability through Selective Rationalization in Pre-trained Language Models

arXiv 2501.03182 ↗First posted 3 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread application of pre-trained language models (PLMs) in natural language processing (NLP) has led to increasing concerns about their explainability. Selective rationalization is a self-explanatory framework that selects human-intelligible input subsets as rationales for predictions. Recent studies have shown that applying existing rationalization frameworks to PLMs will result in severe degeneration and failure problems, producing sub-optimal or meaningless rationales. Such failures severely damage trust in rationalization methods and constrain the application of rationalization techniques on PLMs. In this paper, we find that the homogeneity of tokens in the sentences produced by PLMs is the primary contributor to these problems. To address these challenges, we propose a method named Pre-trained Language Model's Rationalization (PLMR), which splits PLMs into a generator and a predictor to deal with NLP tasks while providing interpretable rationales. The generator in PLMR also alleviates homogeneity by pruning irrelevant tokens, while the predictor uses full-text information to standardize predictions. Experiments conducted on two widely used datasets across multiple PLMs demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method PLMR in addressing the challenge of applying selective rationalization to PLMs. Codes: https://github.com/ylb777/PLMR.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2025.

Builds on

21 of 40 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  6. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  7. 2020Invariant Rationalizationcited by 131
  8. 2022Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Surveycited by 129
  9. 2019Interpretable Neural Predictions with Differentiable Binary Variablescited by 126
  10. 2019Rethinking Cooperative Rationalization: Introspective Extraction and Complement Controlcited by 96
  11. 2020Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attributioncited by 79
  12. 2018Deriving Machine Attention from Human Rationalescited by 54
9 more
  1. 2021Understanding Interlocking Dynamics of Cooperative Rationalizationcited by 36
  2. 2022Can Rationalization Improve Robustness?cited by 36
  3. 2023Rationalization for Explainable NLP: A Surveycited by 22
  4. 2023D-Separation for Causal Self-Explanationcited by 21
  5. 2023Towards Trustworthy Explanation: On Causal Rationalizationcited by 19
  6. 2022FR: Folded Rationalization with a Unified Encodercited by 18
  7. 2021Distribution Matching for Rationalizationcited by 14
  8. 2023Decoupled Rationalization with Asymmetric Learning Rates: A Flexible Lipschitz Restraintcited by 14
  9. 2024Towards Faithful Explanations: Boosting Rationalization with Shortcuts Discoverycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.