mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Financial Named Entity Recognition: How Far Can LLM Go?

arXiv 2501.02237 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The surge of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized the extraction and analysis of crucial information from a growing volume of financial statements, announcements, and business news. Recognition for named entities to construct structured data poses a significant challenge in analyzing financial documents and is a foundational task for intelligent financial analytics. However, how effective are these generic LLMs and their performance under various prompts are yet need a better understanding. To fill in the blank, we present a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs and prompting methods in the financial Named Entity Recognition (NER) problem. Specifically, our experimental results highlight their strengths and limitations, identify five representative failure types, and provide insights into their potential and challenges for domain-specific tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2025.

Builds on

8 of 18 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  5. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
  6. 2023Large Language Models in Finance: A Surveycited by 223
  7. 2024Large Language Models Meet NLP: A Surveycited by 102
  8. 2023Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? A Study on Several Typical Taskscited by 59

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.