Navigating Chemical-Linguistic Sharing Space with Heterogeneous Molecular Encoding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Chemical language models (CLMs) are prominent for their effectiveness in exploring chemical space and enabling molecular engineering. However, while exploring chemical-linguistic space, CLMs suffer from the gap between natural language and molecular representations. This challenge is primarily due to the inherent modeling differences between molecules and texts: molecules operate unified modeling to learn chemical space, while natural language sequentially models the semantic space. Additionally, the limited availability of high-quality text-to-molecule datasets further exacerbates this challenge. To address the problem, we first verified the information bias in molecular representations from different perspectives. We then developed the Heterogeneous Molecular Encoding (HME) framework, a unified molecular encoder compressing the molecular features from fragment sequence, topology, and conformation with Q-learning. To better model chemical-linguistic space, we further constructed the MCMoD dataset, which contains over one million molecules with various conditions, including properties, fragments, and descriptions. Experimentally, HME promotes CLMs to achieve chemical-linguistic sharing space exploration: (1) chemical space exploration with linguistic guidance, where HME achieves significant improvements (+8.9% FCD) for molecular design in multiple constraints, even in zero-shot scenarios; (2) linguistic space exploration with molecular guidance, where HME generates textual descriptions with high qualities (+11.6% BLEU) for molecules. These results highlight the precision of HME in handling multi-objective and cross-domain tasks, as well as its remarkable generalization capability on unseen task combinations. HME offers a new perspective on navigating chemical-linguistic sharing space, advancing the potential of CLMs in both fundamental research and practical applications in chemistry.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025Beyond Chemical QA: Evaluating LLM's Chemical Reasoning with Modular Chemical Operationscited by 49
- 2026LatentChem: From Textual CoT to Latent Thinking in Chemical Reasoningcited by 8
- 2025How to Detect and Defeat Molecular Mirage: A Metric-Driven Benchmark for Hallucination in LLM-based Molecular Comprehensioncited by 6
- 2026Agentic reinforcement learning empowers next-generation chemical language models for molecular design and synthesiscited by 6
- 2026MoleCode unlocks structural intelligence in large language modelscited by 1
- 2026TMCS: Tool-Grounded Multi-Agent Reasoning for Compositional Chemical Problem Solvingcited by 0
- 2026TMCS: Tool-Grounded Multi-Agent Reasoning for Compositional Chemical Problem Solving28 Sep 2026
- 2026MoleCode unlocks structural intelligence in large language models15 May 2026
- 2026LatentChem: From Textual CoT to Latent Thinking in Chemical Reasoning6 Feb 2026
- 2026Agentic reinforcement learning empowers next-generation chemical language models for molecular design and synthesis25 Jan 2026
- 2025Beyond Chemical QA: Evaluating LLM's Chemical Reasoning with Modular Chemical Operations27 May 2025
- 2025How to Detect and Defeat Molecular Mirage: A Metric-Driven Benchmark for Hallucination in LLM-based Molecular Comprehension10 Apr 2025