On Demographic Group Fairness Guarantees in Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a theoretical framework analyzing the relationship between data distributions and fairness guarantees in equitable deep learning. We establish novel bounds that account for distribution heterogeneity across demographic groups, deriving fairness error and convergence rate bounds that characterize how distributional differences affect the fairness-accuracy trade-off. Extensive experiments across diverse modalities, including FairVision, CheXpert, HAM10000, FairFace, ACS Income, and CivilComments-WILDS, validate our theoretical findings, demonstrating that feature distribution differences across demographic groups significantly impact model fairness, with disparities particularly pronounced in racial categories. Motivated by these insights, we propose Fairness-Aware Regularization (FAR), a practical training objective that minimizes inter-group discrepancies in feature centroids and covariances. FAR consistently improves overall AUC, ES-AUC, and subgroup performance across all datasets. Our work advances the theoretical understanding of fairness in AI systems and provides a foundation for developing more equitable algorithms. The code for analysis is publicly available at https://github.com/Harvard-AI-and-Robotics-Lab/FairnessGuarantee.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2024.
Builds on
32 of 56 references.
References · 32
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 623
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
20 more
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
- 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 409
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 337
- 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 335
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
- 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
- 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 194
- 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 181
- 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 156
- 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
- 2018The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairnesscited by 95
- 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
- 2022Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep Classifierscited by 53
- 2023FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness Methodscited by 33
- 2019Bias Remediation in Driver Drowsiness Detection systems using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 14
- 2023FairVision: Equitable Deep Learning for Eye Disease Screening via Fair Identity Scalingcited by 13
- 2022FaiREE: Fair Classification with Finite-Sample and Distribution-Free Guaranteecited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.