mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MAFT: Efficient Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing for Deep Neural Networks via Zero-Order Gradient Search

arXiv 2412.20086 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown powerful performance in various applications and are increasingly being used in decision-making systems. However, concerns about fairness in DNNs always persist. Some efficient white-box fairness testing methods about individual fairness have been proposed. Nevertheless, the development of black-box methods has stagnated, and the performance of existing methods is far behind that of white-box methods. In this paper, we propose a novel black-box individual fairness testing method called Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing (MAFT). By leveraging MAFT, practitioners can effectively identify and address discrimination in DL models, regardless of the specific algorithm or architecture employed. Our approach adopts lightweight procedures such as gradient estimation and attribute perturbation rather than non-trivial procedures like symbol execution, rendering it significantly more scalable and applicable than existing methods. We demonstrate that MAFT achieves the same effectiveness as state-of-the-art white-box methods whilst improving the applicability to large-scale networks. Compared to existing black-box approaches, our approach demonstrates distinguished performance in discovering fairness violations w.r.t effectiveness (approximately 14.69 times) and efficiency (approximately 32.58 times).

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2024.

Builds on

25 of 55 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  3. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  4. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
  5. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  6. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  7. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
  8. 2019Simple Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 249
  9. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  10. 2017Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discriminationcited by 123
  11. 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
  12. 2016Satisfying Real-world Goals with Dataset Constraintscited by 68
13 more
  1. 2018The Price of Fair PCA: One Extra Dimensioncited by 67
  2. 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
  3. 2020FairRec: Fairness-aware News Recommendation with Decomposed Adversarial Learningcited by 44
  4. 2021NeuronFair: Interpretable White-Box Fairness Testing through Biased Neuron Identificationcited by 42
  5. 2017Penalizing Unfairness in Binary Classificationcited by 25
  6. 2023Latent Imitator: Generating Natural Individual Discriminatory Instances for Black-Box Fairness Testingcited by 23
  7. 2018Automated Test Generation to Detect Individual Discrimination in AI Modelscited by 21
  8. 2020VerifyMed -- A blockchain platform for transparent trust in virtualized healthcare: Proof-of-conceptcited by 14
  9. 2020On Fair Selection in the Presence of Implicit Variancecited by 14
  10. 2020Astraea: Grammar-based Fairness Testingcited by 11
  11. 2021On Fair Selection in the Presence of Implicit and Differential Variancecited by 9
  12. 2021Fairness Testing of Deep Image Classification with Adequacy Metricscited by 6
  13. 2022Enhanced Fairness Testing via Generating Effective Initial Individual Discriminatory Instancescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.