mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhanced Fairness Testing via Generating Effective Initial Individual Discriminatory Instances

arXiv 2209.08321 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2022cs.SE cs.CY cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness testing aims at mitigating unintended discrimination in the decision-making process of data-driven AI systems. Individual discrimination may occur when an AI model makes different decisions for two distinct individuals who are distinguishable solely according to protected attributes, such as age and race. Such instances reveal biased AI behaviour, and are called Individual Discriminatory Instances (IDIs). In this paper, we propose an approach for the selection of the initial seeds to generate IDIs for fairness testing. Previous studies mainly used random initial seeds to this end. However this phase is crucial, as these seeds are the basis of the follow-up IDIs generation. We dubbed our proposed seed selection approach I&D. It generates a large number of initial IDIs exhibiting a great diversity, aiming at improving the overall performance of fairness testing. Our empirical study reveal that I&D is able to produce a larger number of IDIs with respect to four state-of-the-art seed generation approaches, generating 1.68X more IDIs on average. Moreover, we compare the use of I&D to train machine learning models and find that using I&D reduces the number of remaining IDIs by 29% when compared to the state-of-the-art, thus indicating that I&D is effective for improving model fairness

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2022.

Builds on

22 of 55 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  4. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  5. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  6. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  7. 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 213
  8. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  9. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
  10. 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
  11. 2017Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discriminationcited by 123
  12. 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
10 more
  1. 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 92
  2. 2018Automated Directed Fairness Testingcited by 77
  3. 2022Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trendscited by 61
  4. 2020Do the Machine Learning Models on a Crowd Sourced Platform Exhibit Bias? An Empirical Study on Model Fairnesscited by 52
  5. 2021Fair Preprocessing: Towards Understanding Compositional Fairness of Data Transformers in Machine Learning Pipelinecited by 49
  6. 2021NeuronFair: Interpretable White-Box Fairness Testing through Biased Neuron Identificationcited by 42
  7. 2018Automated Test Generation to Detect Individual Discrimination in AI Modelscited by 21
  8. 2020VerifyMed -- A blockchain platform for transparent trust in virtualized healthcare: Proof-of-conceptcited by 14
  9. 2020Fairkit, Fairkit, on the Wall, Who's the Fairest of Them All? Supporting Data Scientists in Training Fair Modelscited by 9
  10. 2022Software Fairness: An Analysis and Surveycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.