mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Find the Intention of Instruction: Comprehensive Evaluation of Instruction Understanding for Large Language Models

arXiv 2412.19450 ↗First posted 27 Dec 2024cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the key strengths of Large Language Models (LLMs) is their ability to interact with humans by generating appropriate responses to given instructions. This ability, known as instruction-following capability, has established a foundation for the use of LLMs across various fields and serves as a crucial metric for evaluating their performance. While numerous evaluation benchmarks have been developed, most focus solely on clear and coherent instructions. However, we have noted that LLMs can become easily distracted by instruction-formatted statements, which may lead to an oversight of their instruction comprehension skills. To address this issue, we introduce the Intention of Instruction (IoInst) benchmark. This benchmark evaluates LLMs' capacity to remain focused and understand instructions without being misled by extraneous instructions. The primary objective of this benchmark is to identify the appropriate instruction that accurately guides the generation of a given context. Our findings suggest that even recently introduced state-of-the-art models still lack instruction understanding capability. Along with the proposition of IoInst in this study, we also present broad analyses of the several strategies potentially applicable to IoInst.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2024.

Builds on

23 of 44 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  5. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  6. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  7. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  8. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
  9. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  10. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
  11. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  12. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
11 more
  1. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 628
  2. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
  3. 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
  4. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  5. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
  6. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
  7. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
  8. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 290
  9. 2023SOLAR 10.7B: Scaling Large Language Models with Simple yet Effective Depth Up-Scalingcited by 172
  10. 2023Wider and Deeper LLM Networks are Fairer LLM Evaluatorscited by 91
  11. 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.