mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting PCA for time series reduction in temporal dimension

arXiv 2412.19423 ↗First posted 27 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.APcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Revisiting PCA for Time Series Reduction in Temporal Dimension; Jiaxin Gao, Wenbo Hu, Yuntian Chen; Deep learning has significantly advanced time series analysis (TSA), enabling the extraction of complex patterns for tasks like classification, forecasting, and regression. Although dimensionality reduction has traditionally focused on the variable space-achieving notable success in minimizing data redundancy and computational complexity-less attention has been paid to reducing the temporal dimension. In this study, we revisit Principal Component Analysis (PCA), a classical dimensionality reduction technique, to explore its utility in temporal dimension reduction for time series data. It is generally thought that applying PCA to the temporal dimension would disrupt temporal dependencies, leading to limited exploration in this area. However, our theoretical analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate that applying PCA to sliding series windows not only maintains model performance, but also enhances computational efficiency. In auto-regressive forecasting, the temporal structure is partially preserved through windowing, and PCA is applied within these windows to denoise the time series while retaining their statistical information. By preprocessing time-series data with PCA, we reduce the temporal dimensionality before feeding it into TSA models such as Linear, Transformer, CNN, and RNN architectures. This approach accelerates training and inference and reduces resource consumption. Notably, PCA improves Informer training and inference speed by up to 40% and decreases GPU memory usage of TimesNet by 30%, without sacrificing model accuracy. Comparative analysis against other reduction methods further highlights the effectiveness of PCA in improving the efficiency of TSA models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2024.

Builds on

13 of 53 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  2. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
  3. 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 497
  4. 2018The UEA multivariate time series classification archive, 2018cited by 338
  5. 2024SparseTSF: Modeling Long-term Time Series Forecasting with 1k Parameterscited by 107
  6. 2024TSLANet: Rethinking Transformers for Time Series Representation Learningcited by 74
  7. 2023MTS-Mixers: Multivariate Time Series Forecasting via Factorized Temporal and Channel Mixingcited by 53
  8. 2023Vector Quantized Time Series Generation with a Bidirectional Prior Modelcited by 50
  9. 2024Fredformer: Frequency Debiased Transformer for Time Series Forecastingcited by 45
  10. 2013Word Emdeddings through Hellinger PCAcited by 10
  11. 2023Client: Cross-variable Linear Integrated Enhanced Transformer for Multivariate Long-Term Time Series Forecastingcited by 8
  12. 2023Transformer Multivariate Forecasting: Less is More?cited by 5
1 more
  1. 2016How Many Components should be Retained from a Multivariate Time Series PCA?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.