mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Federated Graph Learning via Adaptive Fusion of Structural and Node Characteristics

arXiv 2412.18845 ↗First posted 25 Dec 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Graph Learning (FGL) has demonstrated the advantage of training a global Graph Neural Network (GNN) model across distributed clients using their local graph data. Unlike Euclidean data (eg, images), graph data is composed of nodes and edges, where the overall node-edge connections determine the topological structure, and individual nodes along with their neighbors capture local node features. However, existing studies tend to prioritize one aspect over the other, leading to an incomplete understanding of the data and the potential misidentification of key characteristics across varying graph scenarios. Additionally, the non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) nature of graph data makes the extraction of these two data characteristics even more challenging. To address the above issues, we propose a novel FGL framework, named FedGCF, which aims to simultaneously extract and fuse structural properties and node features to effectively handle diverse graph scenarios. FedGCF first clusters clients by structural similarity, performing model aggregation within each cluster to form the shared structural model. Next, FedGCF selects the clients with common node features and aggregates their models to generate a common node model. This model is then propagated to all clients, allowing common node features to be shared. By combining these two models with a proper ratio, FedGCF can achieve a comprehensive understanding of the graph data and deliver better performance, even under non-IID distributions. Experimental results show that FedGCF improves accuracy by 4.94%-7.24% under different data distributions and reduces communication cost by 64.18%-81.25% to reach the same accuracy compared to baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2024.

Builds on

23 of 50 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  5. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  6. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  7. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  8. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  9. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  10. 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,470
  11. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
  12. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
11 more
  1. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
  2. 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
  3. 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 456
  4. 2019The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 303
  5. 2018NetGAN: Generating Graphs via Random Walkscited by 129
  6. 2021Federated Graph Classification over Non-IID Graphscited by 113
  7. 2021FedGNN: Federated Graph Neural Network for Privacy-Preserving Recommendationcited by 97
  8. 2015A Survey on Contextual Multi-armed Banditscited by 34
  9. 2024Federated Graph Semantic and Structural Learningcited by 30
  10. 2022FedGCN: Convergence-Communication Tradeoffs in Federated Training of Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 24
  11. 2023GLASU: A Communication-Efficient Algorithm for Federated Learning with Vertically Distributed Graph Datacited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.