A Systems Thinking Approach to Algorithmic Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Systems thinking provides us with a way to model the algorithmic fairness problem by allowing us to encode prior knowledge and assumptions about where we believe bias might exist in the data generating process. We can then encode these beliefs as a series of causal graphs, enabling us to link AI/ML systems to politics and the law. This allows us to combine techniques from machine learning, causal inference, and system dynamics in order to capture different emergent aspects of the fairness problem. We can use systems thinking to help policymakers on both sides of the political aisle to understand the complex trade-offs that exist from different types of fairness policies, providing a sociotechnical foundation for designing AI policy that is aligned to their political agendas and with society's shared democratic values.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2024.
Builds on
8 of 62 references.
References · 8
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 276
- 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 191
- 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2022Causal Conceptions of Fairness and their Consequencescited by 38
- 2023The Disparate Impacts of College Admissions Policies on Asian American Applicantscited by 1
- 2024Debiasing Alternative Data for Credit Underwriting Using Causal Inferencecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.