mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Jet: A Modern Transformer-Based Normalizing Flow

arXiv 2412.15129 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the past, normalizing generative flows have emerged as a promising class of generative models for natural images. This type of model has many modeling advantages: the ability to efficiently compute log-likelihood of the input data, fast generation and simple overall structure. Normalizing flows remained a topic of active research but later fell out of favor, as visual quality of the samples was not competitive with other model classes, such as GANs, VQ-VAE-based approaches or diffusion models. In this paper we revisit the design of the coupling-based normalizing flow models by carefully ablating prior design choices and using computational blocks based on the Vision Transformer architecture, not convolutional neural networks. As a result, we achieve state-of-the-art quantitative and qualitative performance with a much simpler architecture. While the overall visual quality is still behind the current state-of-the-art models, we argue that strong normalizing flow models can help advancing research frontier by serving as building components of more powerful generative models.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2024.

Builds on

21 of 26 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  3. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  4. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  5. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
  6. 2016Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoderscited by 862
  7. 2016Pixel Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 816
  8. 2018Image Transformercited by 772
  9. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 769
  10. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 640
  11. 2017PixelCNN++: Improving the PixelCNN with Discretized Logistic Mixture Likelihood and Other Modificationscited by 417
  12. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 377
9 more
  1. 2015A note on the evaluation of generative modelscited by 292
  2. 2019Flow++: Improving Flow-Based Generative Models with Variational Dequantization and Architecture Designcited by 262
  3. 2016Variational Lossy Autoencodercited by 176
  4. 2024Normalizing Flows are Capable Generative Modelscited by 91
  5. 2018Generating High Fidelity Images with Subscale Pixel Networks and Multidimensional Upscalingcited by 74
  6. 2021Densely connected normalizing flowscited by 49
  7. 2024JetFormer: An Autoregressive Generative Model of Raw Images and Textcited by 46
  8. 2019Emerging Convolutions for Generative Normalizing Flowscited by 31
  9. 2020Normalizing Flows with Multi-Scale Autoregressive Priorscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 3.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Fast & Efficient Normalizing Flows and Applications of Image Generative Models
  2. 2025STARFlow: Scaling Latent Normalizing Flows for High-resolution Image Synthesis
  3. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling
  4. 2023Conditional Generative Modeling for Images, 3D Animations, and Video
  5. 2026Normalizing Flows with Iterative Denoising
  6. 2023Flow Matching in Latent Space
  7. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis
  8. 2025STARFlow-V: End-to-End Video Generative Modeling with Normalizing Flows