Enhancing Rhetorical Figure Annotation: An Ontology-Based Web Application with RAG Integration
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Privacy and security of RAG
Abstract (arXiv)
Rhetorical figures play an important role in our communication. They are used to convey subtle, implicit meaning, or to emphasize statements. We notice them in hate speech, fake news, and propaganda. By improving the systems for computational detection of rhetorical figures, we can also improve tasks such as hate speech and fake news detection, sentiment analysis, opinion mining, or argument mining. Unfortunately, there is a lack of annotated data, as well as qualified annotators that would help us build large corpora to train machine learning models for the detection of rhetorical figures. The situation is particularly difficult in languages other than English, and for rhetorical figures other than metaphor, sarcasm, and irony. To overcome this issue, we develop a web application called "Find your Figure" that facilitates the identification and annotation of German rhetorical figures. The application is based on the German Rhetorical ontology GRhOOT which we have specially adapted for this purpose. In addition, we improve the user experience with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). In this paper, we present the restructuring of the ontology, the development of the web application, and the built-in RAG pipeline. We also identify the optimal RAG settings for our application. Our approach is one of the first to practically use rhetorical ontologies in combination with RAG and shows promising results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 7 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2024.
Builds on
7 of 43 references.
References · 7
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Surveycited by 354
- 2022FLUTE: Figurative Language Understanding through Textual Explanationscited by 79
- 2021Potential Idiomatic Expression (PIE)-English: Corpus for Classes of Idiomscited by 15
- 2022CATs are Fuzzy PETs: A Corpus and Analysis of Potentially Euphemistic Termscited by 14
- 2023An Experiment in Retrofitting Competency Questions for Existing Ontologiescited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Metaphor identification using large language models: A comparison of RAG, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning
- 2026CATCH-ME if you RAG: a dataset of Contextually Annotated multi-Turn Counterspeech against Hate and Misinformation Exchanges
- 2025Labels or Input? Rethinking Augmentation in Multimodal Hate Detection
- 2026Is AI Ready for Multimodal Hate Speech Detection? A Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark Evaluation ↗
- 2026FBHM: Functional Benchmarking and Steering of VLMs for Hateful Meme Detection
- 2024Target Span Detection for Implicit Harmful Content
- 2023From Dogwhistles to Bullhorns: Unveiling Coded Rhetoric with Language Models
- 2024Propaganda to Hate: A Multimodal Analysis of Arabic Memes with Multi-Agent LLMs