Human-in-the-Loop Generation of Adversarial Texts: A Case Study on Tibetan Script
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
DNN-based language models excel across various NLP tasks but remain highly vulnerable to textual adversarial attacks. While adversarial text generation is crucial for NLP security, explainability, evaluation, and data augmentation, related work remains overwhelmingly English-centric, leaving the problem of constructing high-quality and sustainable adversarial robustness benchmarks for lower-resourced languages both difficult and understudied. First, method customization for lower-resourced languages is complicated due to linguistic differences and limited resources. Second, automated attacks are prone to generating invalid or ambiguous adversarial texts. Last but not least, language models continuously evolve and may be immune to parts of previously generated adversarial texts. To address these challenges, we introduce HITL-GAT, an interactive system based on a general approach to human-in-the-loop generation of adversarial texts. Additionally, we demonstrate the utility of HITL-GAT through a case study on Tibetan script, employing three customized adversarial text generation methods and establishing its first adversarial robustness benchmark, providing a valuable reference for other lower-resourced languages.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.
Builds on
26 of 42 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
- 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 530
- 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 491
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 424
14 more
- 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 381
- 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
- 2021Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 232
- 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 211
- 2019Gradio: Hassle-Free Sharing and Testing of ML Models in the Wildcited by 178
- 2022Why Should Adversarial Perturbations be Imperceptible? Rethink the Research Paradigm in Adversarial NLPcited by 102
- 2018On Adversarial Examples for Character-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 85
- 2020OpenAttack: An Open-source Textual Adversarial Attack Toolkitcited by 84
- 2022SemAttack: Natural Textual Attacks via Different Semantic Spacescited by 42
- 2021Putting Humans in the Natural Language Processing Loop: A Surveycited by 40
- 2024Code-Switching Red-Teaming: LLM Evaluation for Safety and Multilingual Understandingcited by 34
- 2024Pay Attention to the Robustness of Chinese Minority Language Models! Syllable-level Textual Adversarial Attack on Tibetan Scriptcited by 4
- 2024TSCheater: Generating High-Quality Tibetan Adversarial Texts via Visual Similaritycited by 2
- 2024Multi-Granularity Tibetan Textual Adversarial Attack Method Based on Masked Language Modelcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.