mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Multi-Granularity Tibetan Textual Adversarial Attack Method Based on Masked Language Model

arXiv 2412.02343 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In social media, neural network models have been applied to hate speech detection, sentiment analysis, etc., but neural network models are susceptible to adversarial attacks. For instance, in a text classification task, the attacker elaborately introduces perturbations to the original texts that hardly alter the original semantics in order to trick the model into making different predictions. By studying textual adversarial attack methods, the robustness of language models can be evaluated and then improved. Currently, most of the research in this field focuses on English, and there is also a certain amount of research on Chinese. However, there is little research targeting Chinese minority languages. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology and the emergence of Chinese minority language models, textual adversarial attacks become a new challenge for the information processing of Chinese minority languages. In response to this situation, we propose a multi-granularity Tibetan textual adversarial attack method based on masked language models called TSTricker. We utilize the masked language models to generate candidate substitution syllables or words, adopt the scoring mechanism to determine the substitution order, and then conduct the attack method on several fine-tuned victim models. The experimental results show that TSTricker reduces the accuracy of the classification models by more than 28.70% and makes the classification models change the predictions of more than 90.60% of the samples, which has an evidently higher attack effect than the baseline method.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.

Builds on

6 of 21 references.

References · 6

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
  2. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 668
  3. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
  4. 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 223
  5. 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 211
  6. 2019Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systemscited by 101

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.