Improving Cooperation in Language Games with Bayesian Inference and the Cognitive Hierarchy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In two-player cooperative games, agents can play together effectively when they have accurate assumptions about how their teammate will behave, but may perform poorly when these assumptions are inaccurate. In language games, failure may be due to disagreement in the understanding of either the semantics or pragmatics of an utterance. We model coarse uncertainty in semantics using a prior distribution of language models and uncertainty in pragmatics using the cognitive hierarchy, combining the two aspects into a single prior distribution over possible partner types. Fine-grained uncertainty in semantics is modeled using noise that is added to the embeddings of words in the language. To handle all forms of uncertainty we construct agents that learn the behavior of their partner using Bayesian inference and use this information to maximize the expected value of a heuristic function. We test this approach by constructing Bayesian agents for the game of Codenames, and show that they perform better in experiments where semantics is uncertain
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2024.
Builds on
7 of 36 references.
References · 7
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
- 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
- 2024GameBench: Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Abilities of LLM Agentscited by 95
- 2018Bayesian Action Decoder for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2022K-level Reasoning for Zero-Shot Coordination in Hanabicited by 32
- 2021Learning to Perturb Word Embeddings for Out-of-distribution QAcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Position: Theory of Mind Benchmarks are Broken for Large Language Modelscited by 31
- 2025Shall We Play a Game? Language Models for Open-ended Wargamescited by 2
- 2026Decentralized Aggregation of LLM Predictions via Wagering Mechanismscited by 0
- 2026Robust Is Salient: An Informed Adversary Moves the Optimal Signal onto the Salience Polecited by 0
- 2026Robust Is Salient: An Informed Adversary Moves the Optimal Signal onto the Salience Pole23 Sep 2026
- 2026Decentralized Aggregation of LLM Predictions via Wagering Mechanisms5 Jul 2026
- 2025Shall We Play a Game? Language Models for Open-ended Wargames21 Sep 2025
- 2024Position: Theory of Mind Benchmarks are Broken for Large Language Models27 Dec 2024