mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Impact of Generalization Techniques on the Interplay Among Privacy, Utility, and Fairness in Image Classification

arXiv 2412.11951 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates the trade-offs between fairness, privacy, and utility in image classification using machine learning (ML). Recent research suggests that generalization techniques can improve the balance between privacy and utility. One focus of this work is sharpness-aware training (SAT) and its integration with differential privacy (DP-SAT) to further improve this balance. Additionally, we examine fairness in both private and non-private learning models trained on datasets with synthetic and real-world biases. We also measure the privacy risks involved in these scenarios by performing membership inference attacks (MIAs) and explore the consequences of eliminating high-privacy risk samples, termed outliers. Moreover, we introduce a new metric, named harmonic score, which combines accuracy, privacy, and fairness into a single measure. Through empirical analysis using generalization techniques, we achieve an accuracy of 81.11% under (8, 10-5)-DP on CIFAR-10, surpassing the 79.5% reported by De et al. (2022). Moreover, our experiments show that memorization of training samples can begin before the overfitting point, and generalization techniques do not guarantee the prevention of this memorization. Our analysis of synthetic biases shows that generalization techniques can amplify model bias in both private and non-private models. Additionally, our results indicate that increased bias in training data leads to reduced accuracy, greater vulnerability to privacy attacks, and higher model bias. We validate these findings with the CelebA dataset, demonstrating that similar trends persist with real-world attribute imbalances. Finally, our experiments show that removing outlier data decreases accuracy and further amplifies model bias.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2024.

Builds on

25 of 38 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  5. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  6. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  7. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
  8. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 769
  9. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 498
  10. 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 460
  11. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  12. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 292
13 more
  1. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  2. 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
  3. 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 204
  4. 2021On the Importance of Difficulty Calibration in Membership Inference Attackscited by 147
  5. 2021Efficient Sharpness-aware Minimization for Improved Training of Neural Networkscited by 137
  6. 2022The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relativecited by 136
  7. 2020BYOL works even without batch statisticscited by 95
  8. 2022Toward Training at ImageNet Scale with Differential Privacycited by 87
  9. 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
  10. 2021Robin Hood and Matthew Effects: Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Synthetic Datacited by 48
  11. 2021DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy?cited by 33
  12. 2021Not all noise is accounted equally: How differentially private learning benefits from large sampling ratescited by 21
  13. 2022A Blessing of Dimensionality in Membership Inference through Regularizationcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021The Connection between Out-of-Distribution Generalization and Privacy of ML Models
  2. 2026Privacy Cost as Equity Input: A Group Fairness Criterion for Differentially Private Machine Learning
  3. 2025Do Fairness Interventions Come at the Cost of Privacy: Evaluations for Binary Classifiers
  4. 2021Generalization Techniques Empirically Outperform Differential Privacy against Membership Inference
  5. 2022On the Privacy Effect of Data Enhancement via the Lens of Memorization
  6. 2021DP-UTIL: Comprehensive Utility Analysis of Differential Privacy in Machine Learning
  7. 2025On the Fairness of Privacy Protection: Measuring and Mitigating the Disparity of Group Privacy Risks for Differentially Private Machine Learning
  8. 2024Explaining the Model, Protecting Your Data: Revealing and Mitigating the Data Privacy Risks of Post-Hoc Model Explanations via Membership Inference