Why and How: Knowledge-Guided Learning for Cross-Spectral Image Patch Matching
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, cross-spectral image patch matching based on feature relation learning has attracted extensive attention. However, performance bottleneck problems have gradually emerged in existing methods. To address this challenge, we make the first attempt to explore a stable and efficient bridge between descriptor learning and metric learning, and construct a knowledge-guided learning network (KGL-Net), which achieves amazing performance improvements while abandoning complex network structures. Specifically, we find that there is feature extraction consistency between metric learning based on feature difference learning and descriptor learning based on Euclidean distance. This provides the foundation for bridge building. To ensure the stability and efficiency of the constructed bridge, on the one hand, we conduct an in-depth exploration of 20 combined network architectures. On the other hand, a feature-guided loss is constructed to achieve mutual guidance of features. In addition, unlike existing methods, we consider that the feature mapping ability of the metric branch should receive more attention. Therefore, a hard negative sample mining for metric learning (HNSM-M) strategy is constructed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that hard negative sample mining for metric networks has been implemented and brings significant performance gains. Extensive experimental results show that our KGL-Net achieves SOTA performance in three different cross-spectral image patch matching scenarios. Our code are available at https://github.com/YuChuang1205/KGL-Net.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2024.
Builds on
16 of 56 references.
References · 16
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2019ECA-Net: Efficient Channel Attention for Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
- 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 264
- 2017Working hard to know your neighbor's margins: Local descriptor learning losscited by 212
- 2019SOSNet: Second Order Similarity Regularization for Local Descriptor Learningcited by 131
- 2015Learning to Compare Image Patches via Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 109
- 2022Beyond Cross-view Image Retrieval: Highly Accurate Vehicle Localization Using Satellite Imagecited by 88
- 2019Hardness-Aware Deep Metric Learningcited by 55
- 2019Filter Response Normalization Layer: Eliminating Batch Dependence in the Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 45
- 2017Learning Spread-out Local Feature Descriptorscited by 34
- 2015Learning Local Image Descriptors with Deep Siamese and Triplet Convolutional Networks by Minimising Global Loss Functionscited by 33
- 2023Zero-Shot Everything Sketch-Based Image Retrieval, and in Explainable Stylecited by 25
4 more
- 2016PN-Net: Conjoined Triple Deep Network for Learning Local Image Descriptorscited by 16
- 2017How to Train Triplet Networks with 100K Identities?cited by 8
- 2018Deep Multi-Spectral Registration Using Invariant Descriptor Learningcited by 6
- 2018TS-Net: Combining modality specific and common features for multimodal patch matchingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.