Partial Identifiability in Inverse Reinforcement Learning For Agents With Non-Exponential Discounting
On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Inverse reinforcement learning
Abstract (arXiv)
The aim of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is to infer an agent's preferences from observing their behaviour. Usually, preferences are modelled as a reward function, R, and behaviour is modelled as a policy, π. One of the central difficulties in IRL is that multiple preferences may lead to the same observed behaviour. That is, R is typically underdetermined by π, which means that R is only partially identifiable. Recent work has characterised the extent of this partial identifiability for different types of agents, including optimal and Boltzmann-rational agents. However, work so far has only considered agents that discount future reward exponentially: this is a serious limitation, especially given that extensive work in the behavioural sciences suggests that humans are better modelled as discounting hyperbolically. In this work, we newly characterise partial identifiability in IRL for agents with non-exponential discounting: our results are in particular relevant for hyperbolical discounting, but they also more generally apply to agents that use other types of (non-exponential) discounting. We significantly show that generally IRL is unable to infer enough information about R to identify the correct optimal policy, which entails that IRL alone can be insufficient to adequately characterise the preferences of such agents.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Inverse reinforcement learning, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 3 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2024.
Builds on
3 of 22 references.
References · 3
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 660
- 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 299
- 2015Learning the Preferences of Ignorant, Inconsistent Agentscited by 45
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Partial Identifiability and Misspecification in Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2021Identifiability in inverse reinforcement learning
- 2023Identifiability and Generalizability in Constrained Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Quantifying the Sensitivity of Inverse Reinforcement Learning to Misspecification
- 2022Identifiability and generalizability from multiple experts in Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2018A Survey of Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Challenges, Methods and Progress
- 2023Towards Theoretical Understanding of Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Efficient Inference for Inverse Reinforcement Learning and Dynamic Discrete Choice Models