VerifiableFL: Verifiable Claims for Federated Learning using Exclaves
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In federated learning (FL), data providers jointly train a machine learning model without sharing their training data. This makes it challenging to provide verifiable claims about the trained FL model, e.g., related to the employed training data, any data sanitization, or the correct training algorithm-a malicious data provider can simply deviate from the correct training protocol without detection. While prior FL training systems have explored the use of trusted execution environments (TEEs) to protect the training computation, such approaches rely on the confidentiality and integrity of TEEs. The confidentiality guarantees of TEEs, however, have been shown to be vulnerable to a wide range of attacks, such as side-channel attacks. We describe VerifiableFL, a system for training FL models that establishes verifiable claims about trained FL models with the help of fine-grained runtime attestation proofs. Since these runtime attestation proofs only require integrity protection, VerifiableFL generates them using the new abstraction of exclaves. Exclaves are integrity-only execution environments, which do not contain software-managed secrets and thus are immune to data leakage attacks. VerifiableFL uses exclaves to attest individual data transformations during FL training without relying on confidentiality guarantees. The runtime attestation proofs then form an attested dataflow graph of the entire FL model training computation. The graph is checked by an auditor to ensure that the trained FL model satisfies its claims, such as the use of data sanitization by data providers or correct aggregation by the model provider. VerifiableFL extends NVFlare FL framework to use exclaves. We show that VerifiableFL introduces less than 12% overhead compared to unprotected FL training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2024.
Builds on
28 of 79 references.
References · 28
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
- 2020MobileBERT: a Compact Task-Agnostic BERT for Resource-Limited Devicescited by 482
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 275
- 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
16 more
- 2019Federated Learning for Emoji Prediction in a Mobile Keyboardcited by 118
- 2021PPFL: Privacy-preserving Federated Learning with Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 93
- 2021Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practicecited by 84
- 2022NVIDIA FLARE: Federated Learning from Simulation to Real-Worldcited by 80
- 2018Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Executioncited by 47
- 2016Understanding the Sparse Vector Technique for Differential Privacycited by 27
- 2024Granite Guardiancited by 25
- 2019Secure and Efficient Federated Transfer Learningcited by 21
- 2021"Adversarial Examples" for Proof-of-Learningcited by 20
- 2023FLShield: A Validation Based Federated Learning Framework to Defend Against Poisoning Attackscited by 15
- 2016C-FLAT: Control-FLow ATtestation for Embedded Systems Softwarecited by 8
- 2019Why and How zk-SNARK Workscited by 5
- 2017LO-FAT: Low-Overhead Control Flow ATtestation in Hardwarecited by 4
- 2019ZombieLoad: Cross-Privilege-Boundary Data Samplingcited by 3
- 2019Insecure Until Proven Updated: Analyzing AMD SEV's Remote Attestationcited by 3
- 2021SecFL: Confidential Federated Learning using TEEscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026PoCoFL: POlicy-COmpliant Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026PoCoFL: POlicy-COmpliant Federated Learning2 Oct 2026