mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Secure and Efficient Federated Transfer Learning

arXiv 1910.13271 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2019cs.CRcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning models require a vast amount of data for accurate training. In reality, most data is scattered across different organizations and cannot be easily integrated under many legal and practical constraints. Federated Transfer Learning (FTL) was introduced in [1] to improve statistical models under a data federation that allow knowledge to be shared without compromising user privacy, and enable complementary knowledge to be transferred in the network. As a result, a target-domain party can build more flexible and powerful models by leveraging rich labels from a source-domain party. However, the excessive computational overhead of the security protocol involved in this model rendered it impractical. In this work, we aim towards enhancing the efficiency and security of existing models for practical collaborative training under a data federation by incorporating Secret Sharing (SS). In literature, only the semi-honest model for Federated Transfer Learning has been considered. In this paper, we improve upon the previous solution, and also allow malicious players who can arbitrarily deviate from the protocol in our FTL model. This is much stronger than the semi-honest model where we assume that parties follow the protocol precisely. We do so using the one of the practical MPC protocol called SPDZ, thus our model can be efficiently extended to any number of parties even in the case of a dishonest majority. In addition, the models evaluated in our setting significantly outperform the previous work, in terms of both runtime and communication cost. A single iteration in our model executes in 0.8 seconds for the semi-honest case and 1.4 seconds for the malicious case for 500 samples, as compared to 35 seconds taken by the previous implementation.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 7; 2025: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Surveycited by 182
  2. 2022Vertical Federated Learning: Concepts, Advances and Challengescited by 104
  3. 2022A Survey on Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 42
  4. 2023Federated Learning for Computer Visioncited by 22
  5. 2021A Coupled Design of Exploiting Record Similarity for Practical Vertical Federated Learningcited by 10
  6. 2024A Survey of Privacy Threats and Defense in Vertical Federated Learning: From Model Life Cycle Perspectivecited by 7
  7. 2022Addressing modern and practical challenges in machine learning: A survey of online federated and transfer learningcited by 6
  8. 2025Federated Learning for Cyber Physical Systems: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 6
  9. 2023Personalised Federated Learning On Heterogeneous Feature Spacescited by 5
  10. 2025Multiplayer Federated Learning: Reaching Equilibrium with Less Communicationcited by 5
  11. 2022Federated and Transfer Learning: A Survey on Adversaries and Defense Mechanismscited by 4
  12. 2022Federated Transfer Learning with Multimodal Datacited by 3
8 more
  1. 2024Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectivescited by 3
  2. 2023FedEmb: A Vertical and Hybrid Federated Learning Algorithm using Network And Feature Embedding Aggregationcited by 2
  3. 2024Vertical Federated Learning Hybrid Local Pre-trainingcited by 1
  4. 2022Framework Construction of an Adversarial Federated Transfer Learning Classifiercited by 0
  5. 2024Survey of Privacy Threats and Countermeasures in Federated Learningcited by 0
  6. 2024CrowdTransfer: Enabling Crowd Knowledge Transfer in AIoT Communitycited by 0
  7. 2024ION-C: Integration of Overlapping Networks via Constraintscited by 0
  8. 2024VerifiableFL: Verifiable Claims for Federated Learning using Exclavescited by 0