mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Look Before You Leap: Enhancing Attention and Vigilance Regarding Harmful Content with GuidelineLLM

arXiv 2412.10423 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite being empowered with alignment mechanisms, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly vulnerable to emerging jailbreak attacks that can compromise their alignment mechanisms. This vulnerability poses significant risks to real-world applications. Existing work faces challenges in both training efficiency and generalization capabilities (i.e., Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback and Red-Teaming). Developing effective strategies to enable LLMs to resist continuously evolving jailbreak attempts represents a significant challenge. To address this challenge, we propose a novel defensive paradigm called GuidelineLLM, which assists LLMs in recognizing queries that may have harmful content. Before LLMs respond to a query, GuidelineLLM first identifies potential risks associated with the query, summarizes these risks into guideline suggestions, and then feeds these guidelines to the responding LLMs. Importantly, our approach eliminates the necessity for additional safety fine-tuning of the LLMs themselves; only the GuidelineLLM requires fine-tuning. This characteristic enhances the general applicability of GuidelineLLM across various LLMs. Experimental results demonstrate that GuidelineLLM can significantly reduce the attack success rate (ASR) against LLM (an average reduction of 34.17% ASR) while maintaining the usefulness of LLM in handling benign queries. The code is available at https://github.com/sqzhang-lazy/GuidelineLLM.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024AutoDefense: Multi-Agent LLM Defense against Jailbreak Attacks2 Mar
  2. 2024Intention Analysis Makes LLMs A Good Jailbreak Defender12 Jan
  3. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
  4. 2023Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations10 Oct
  5. 2023Defending Against Alignment-Breaking Attacks via Robustly Aligned LLM18 Sep
  6. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
  7. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
  8. 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Study23 May

Other references · 11

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  6. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  7. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  8. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  9. 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
  10. 2023LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination, LLMs Know They Are Being Trickedcited by 226
  11. 2023MART: Improving LLM Safety with Multi-round Automatic Red-Teamingcited by 161

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025When Harmless Words Harm: A New Threat to LLM Safety via Conceptual Triggers
  2. 2024Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
  3. 2025Jailbreaking Attacks vs. Content Safety Filters: How Far Are We in the LLM Safety Arms Race?
  4. 2025Guardians and Offenders: A Survey on Harmful Content Generation and Safety Mitigation of LLM
  5. 2025PandaGuard: Systematic Evaluation of LLM Safety against Jailbreaking Attacks
  6. 2025SafeLLM: Unlearning Harmful Outputs from Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks
  7. 2026Safety Paradox: How Enhanced Safety Awareness Leaves LLMs Vulnerable to Posterior Attack
  8. 2025Speak Easy: Eliciting Harmful Jailbreaks from LLMs with Simple Interactions