Advancing Attribution-Based Neural Network Explainability through Relative Absolute Magnitude Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation and Multi-Component Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancement in deep-neural network performance led to the development of new state-of-the-art approaches in numerous areas. However, the black-box nature of neural networks often prohibits their use in areas where model explainability and model transparency are crucial. Over the years, researchers proposed many algorithms to aid neural network understanding and provide additional information to the human expert. One of the most popular methods being Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation (LRP). This method assigns local relevance based on the pixel-wise decomposition of nonlinear classifiers. With the rise of attribution method research, there has emerged a pressing need to assess and evaluate their performance. Numerous metrics have been proposed, each assessing an individual property of attribution methods such as faithfulness, robustness or localization. Unfortunately, no single metric is deemed optimal for every case, and researchers often use several metrics to test the quality of the attribution maps. In this work, we address the shortcomings of the current LRP formulations and introduce a novel method for determining the relevance of input neurons through layer-wise relevance propagation. Furthermore, we apply this approach to the recently developed Vision Transformer architecture and evaluate its performance against existing methods on two image classification datasets, namely ImageNet and PascalVOC. Our results clearly demonstrate the advantage of our proposed method. Furthermore, we discuss the insufficiencies of current evaluation metrics for attribution-based explainability and propose a new evaluation metric that combines the notions of faithfulness, robustness and contrastiveness. We utilize this new metric to evaluate the performance of various attribution-based methods. Our code is available at: https://github.com/davor10105/relative-absolute-magnitude-propagation
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2024.
Builds on
44 of 60 references.
References · 44
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
32 more
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
- 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
- 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
- 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
- 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 185
- 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
- 2022A Consistent and Efficient Evaluation Strategy for Attribution Methodscited by 100
- 2022XAI for Transformers: Better Explanations through Conservative Propagationcited by 100
- 2017Explaining Recurrent Neural Network Predictions in Sentiment Analysiscited by 87
- 2020Use HiResCAM instead of Grad-CAM for faithful explanations of convolutional neural networkscited by 79
- 2020On quantitative aspects of model interpretabilitycited by 71
- 2019Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRPcited by 70
- 2022Framework for Evaluating Faithfulness of Local Explanationscited by 55
- 2019Relative Attributing Propagation: Interpreting the Comparative Contributions of Individual Units in Deep Neural Networkscited by 49
- 2020IROF: a low resource evaluation metric for explanation methodscited by 45
- 2022Rethinking Attention-Model Explainability through Faithfulness Violation Testcited by 43
- 2018Understanding Individual Decisions of CNNs via Contrastive Backpropagationcited by 40
- 2021Focus! Rating XAI Methods and Finding Biasescited by 20
- 2021Logic Traps in Evaluating Attribution Scorescited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.