DECOR:Decomposition and Projection of Text Embeddings for Text-to-Image Customization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text-to-image (T2I) models can effectively capture the content or style of reference images to perform high-quality customization. A representative technique for this is fine-tuning using low-rank adaptations (LoRA), which enables efficient model customization with reference images. However, fine-tuning with a limited number of reference images often leads to overfitting, resulting in issues such as prompt misalignment or content leakage. These issues prevent the model from accurately following the input prompt or generating undesired objects during inference. To address this problem, we examine the text embeddings that guide the diffusion model during inference. This study decomposes the text embedding matrix and conducts a component analysis to understand the embedding space geometry and identify the cause of overfitting. Based on this, we propose DECOR, which projects text embeddings onto a vector space orthogonal to undesired token vectors, thereby reducing the influence of unwanted semantics in the text embeddings. Experimental results demonstrate that DECOR outperforms state-of-the-art customization models and achieves Pareto frontier performance across text and visual alignment evaluation metrics. Furthermore, it generates images more faithful to the input prompts, showcasing its effectiveness in addressing overfitting and enhancing text-to-image customization.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2024.
Builds on
43 of 50 references.
References · 43
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
31 more
- 2023Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 5,466
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2022DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generationcited by 3,286
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2022Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Controlcited by 2,409
- 2022An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversioncited by 2,231
- 2023IP-Adapter: Text Compatible Image Prompt Adapter for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 1,439
- 2022Null-text Inversion for Editing Real Images using Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 1,168
- 2022Multi-Concept Customization of Text-to-Image Diffusioncited by 1,099
- 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 950
- 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 847
- 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
- 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
- 2023SVDiff: Compact Parameter Space for Diffusion Fine-Tuningcited by 338
- 2023FastComposer: Tuning-Free Multi-Subject Image Generation with Localized Attentioncited by 313
- 2023Style Aligned Image Generation via Shared Attentioncited by 214
- 2023StyleDrop: Text-to-Image Generation in Any Stylecited by 197
- 2023Key-Locked Rank One Editing for Text-to-Image Personalizationcited by 194
- 2023ZipLoRA: Any Subject in Any Style by Effectively Merging LoRAscited by 194
- 2023Negative-prompt Inversion: Fast Image Inversion for Editing with Text-guided Diffusion Modelscited by 172
- 2024Measuring Style Similarity in Diffusion Modelscited by 106
- 2024Get What You Want, Not What You Don't: Image Content Suppression for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 62
- 2024Visual Style Prompting with Swapping Self-Attentioncited by 62
- 2024aMUSEd: An Open MUSE Reproductioncited by 32
- 2024Magnet: We Never Know How Text-to-Image Diffusion Models Work, Until We Learn How Vision-Language Models Functioncited by 19
- 2024Infusion: Preventing Customized Text-to-Image Diffusion from Overfittingcited by 9
- 2018Semantic projection: recovering human knowledge of multiple, distinct object features from word embeddingscited by 6
- 2024Break-for-Make: Modular Low-Rank Adaptations for Composable Content-Style Customizationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Uncovering the Text Embedding in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
- 2024AlignIT: Enhancing Prompt Alignment in Customization of Text-to-Image Models
- 2023Navigating Text-To-Image Customization: From LyCORIS Fine-Tuning to Model Evaluation
- 2025Instructing Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Classifier-Guided Semantic Optimization
- 2024Direct Consistency Optimization for Robust Customization of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
- 2026Zero-Shot Personalization of Objects via Textual Inversion
- 2026Equilibrated Diffusion: Frequency-aware Textual Embedding for Equilibrated Image Customization
- 2024A Cat Is A Cat (Not A Dog!): Unraveling Information Mix-ups in Text-to-Image Encoders through Causal Analysis and Embedding Optimization