A Taxonomy of Systemic Risks from General-Purpose AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Through a systematic review of academic literature, we propose a taxonomy of systemic risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI), in particular general-purpose AI. Following the EU AI Act's definition, we consider systemic risks as large-scale threats that can affect entire societies or economies. Starting with an initial pool of 1,781 documents, we analyzed 86 selected papers to identify 13 categories of systemic risks and 50 contributing sources. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of potential threats, ranging from environmental harm and structural discrimination to governance failures and loss of control. Key sources of systemic risk emerge from knowledge gaps, challenges in recognizing harm, and the unpredictable trajectory of AI development. The taxonomy provides a snapshot of current academic literature on systemic risks. This paper contributes to AI safety research by providing a structured groundwork for understanding and addressing the potential large-scale negative societal impacts of general-purpose AI. The taxonomy can inform policymakers in risk prioritization and regulatory development.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 7.
12 papers.
- 2025Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probescited by 45
- 2026Intelligent AI Delegationcited by 16
- 2025DURA-CPS: A Multi-Role Orchestrator for Dependability Assurance in LLM-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 3
- 2026Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyondcited by 3
- 2026Agent-Supported Foresight for AI Systemic Risks: AI Agents for Breadth, Experts for Judgmentcited by 2
- 2025Irresponsible AI: big tech's influence on AI research and associated impactscited by 1
- 2026What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safetycited by 1
- 2026When AI Fails, What Works? A Data-Driven Taxonomy of Real-World AI Risk Mitigation Strategiescited by 1
- 2026Are we Doomed to an AI Race? Why Self-Interest Could Drive Countries Towards a Moratorium on Superintelligencecited by 1
- 2025Dimensional Characterization and Pathway Modeling for Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 0
- 2025RAJ-PGA: Reasoning-Activated Jailbreak and Principle-Guided Alignment Framework for Large Reasoning Modelscited by 0
- 2026Small-world Networks of Agents Brainstorm AI Risks to Support Ideationcited by 0
- 2026Small-world Networks of Agents Brainstorm AI Risks to Support Ideation21 Sep 2026
- 2026Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond2 Jul 2026
- 2026Are we Doomed to an AI Race? Why Self-Interest Could Drive Countries Towards a Moratorium on Superintelligence2 May 2026
- 2026When AI Fails, What Works? A Data-Driven Taxonomy of Real-World AI Risk Mitigation Strategies4 Mar 2026
- 2026Intelligent AI Delegation12 Feb 2026
- 2026Agent-Supported Foresight for AI Systemic Risks: AI Agents for Breadth, Experts for Judgment9 Feb 2026
- 2026What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safety26 Jan 2026
- 2025Irresponsible AI: big tech's influence on AI research and associated impacts27 Nov 2025
- 2025RAJ-PGA: Reasoning-Activated Jailbreak and Principle-Guided Alignment Framework for Large Reasoning Models18 Aug 2025
- 2025Dimensional Characterization and Pathway Modeling for Catastrophic AI Risks8 Aug 2025
- 2025Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probes12 Jun 2025
- 2025DURA-CPS: A Multi-Role Orchestrator for Dependability Assurance in LLM-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems4 Jun 2025