mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TT-MPD: Test Time Model Pruning and Distillation

arXiv 2412.07114 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pruning can be an effective method of compressing large pre-trained models for inference speed acceleration. Previous pruning approaches rely on access to the original training dataset for both pruning and subsequent fine-tuning. However, access to the training data can be limited due to concerns such as data privacy and commercial confidentiality. Furthermore, with covariate shift (disparities between test and training data distributions), pruning and finetuning with training datasets can hinder the generalization of the pruned model to test data. To address these issues, pruning and finetuning the model with test time samples becomes essential. However, test-time model pruning and fine-tuning incur additional computation costs and slow down the model's prediction speed, thus posing efficiency issues. Existing pruning methods are not efficient enough for test time model pruning setting, since finetuning the pruned model is needed to evaluate the importance of removable components. To address this, we propose two variables to approximate the fine-tuned accuracy. We then introduce an efficient pruning method that considers the approximated finetuned accuracy and potential inference latency saving. To enhance fine-tuning efficiency, we propose an efficient knowledge distillation method that only needs to generate pseudo labels for a small set of finetuning samples one time, thereby reducing the expensive pseudo-label generation cost. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves a comparable or superior tradeoff between test accuracy and inference latency, with a 32% relative reduction in pruning and finetuning time compared to the best existing method.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.

Builds on

25 of 36 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  5. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  6. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  7. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
  8. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  9. 2019Improved Knowledge Distillation via Teacher Assistantcited by 573
  10. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
  11. 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 442
  12. 2018Filter Pruning via Geometric Median for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Accelerationcited by 367
13 more
  1. 2021Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistentcited by 259
  2. 2020DynaBERT: Dynamic BERT with Adaptive Width and Depthcited by 251
  3. 2021Block Pruning For Faster Transformerscited by 177
  4. 2021Group Fisher Pruning for Practical Network Compressioncited by 131
  5. 2017Residual Connections Encourage Iterative Inferencecited by 77
  6. 2019Neural Network Pruning with Residual-Connections and Limited-Datacited by 52
  7. 2021Rethinking Network Pruning -- under the Pre-train and Fine-tune Paradigmcited by 40
  8. 2020Neural Networks Are More Productive Teachers Than Human Raters: Active Mixup for Data-Efficient Knowledge Distillation from a Blackbox Modelcited by 28
  9. 2023HomoDistil: Homotopic Task-Agnostic Distillation of Pre-trained Transformerscited by 25
  10. 2020Neuron Merging: Compensating for Pruned Neuronscited by 24
  11. 2020Computation-Efficient Knowledge Distillation via Uncertainty-Aware Mixupcited by 22
  12. 2022Practical Network Acceleration with Tiny Setscited by 10
  13. 2022Compressing Models with Few Samples: Mimicking then Replacingcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Revisiting the Effectiveness of LLM Pruning for Test-Time Scaling
  2. 2025Pruning Laws for Large Language Models
  3. 2021Accelerating Deep Learning with Dynamic Data Pruning
  4. 2024EPSD: Early Pruning with Self-Distillation for Efficient Model Compression
  5. 2021Ps and Qs: Quantization-aware pruning for efficient low latency neural network inference
  6. 2025Test-Time Training Done Right
  7. 2026Beyond FLOPs: Benchmarking Real Inference Acceleration of LLM Pruning under a GEMM-Centric Taxonomy
  8. 2025μ-MoE: Test-Time Pruning as Micro-Grained Mixture-of-Experts