Data Quality Enhancement on the Basis of Diversity with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Uncovered, Difficult, and Noisy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, the use of large language models (LLMs) for text classification has attracted widespread attention. Despite this, the classification accuracy of LLMs has not yet universally surpassed that of smaller models. LLMs can enhance their performance in text classification through fine-tuning. However, existing data quality research based on LLMs is challenging to apply directly to solve text classification problems. To further improve the performance of LLMs in classification tasks, this paper proposes a data quality enhancement (DQE) method for text classification based on LLMs. This method starts by using a greedy algorithm to select data, dividing the dataset into sampled and unsampled subsets, and then performing fine-tuning of the LLMs using the sampled data. Subsequently, this model is used to predict the outcomes for the unsampled data, categorizing incorrectly predicted data into uncovered, difficult, and noisy data. Experimental results demonstrate that our method effectively enhances the performance of LLMs in text classification tasks and significantly improves training efficiency, saving nearly half of the training time. Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance in several open-source classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2024.
Builds on
22 of 35 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2021GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infillingcited by 1,026
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
- 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 559
10 more
- 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 506
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 290
- 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
- 2024Large Language Models Meet NLP: A Surveycited by 102
- 2023Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitationscited by 96
- 2024Fine-Tuned 'Small' LLMs (Still) Significantly Outperform Zero-Shot Generative AI Models in Text Classificationcited by 66
- 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
- 2024Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough?cited by 39
- 2024Pushing The Limit of LLM Capacity for Text Classificationcited by 28
- 2024Data Generation Using Large Language Models for Text Classification: An Empirical Case Studycited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.