mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Efficient Model Maintenance Approach for MLOps

arXiv 2412.04657 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2024cs.SE cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, many industries have utilized machine learning (ML) models in their systems. Ideally, ML models should be trained on and applied to data from the same distributions. However, the data evolves over time in many application areas, leading to concept drift, which in turn causes the performance of the ML models to degrade over time. Therefore, maintaining up-to-date ML models plays a critical role in the MLOps pipeline. Existing ML model maintenance approaches are often computationally resource-intensive, costly, time-consuming, and model-dependent. Thus, we propose an improved MLOps pipeline, a new model maintenance approach and a Similarity-Based Model Reuse (SimReuse) tool to address the challenges of ML model maintenance. We identify seasonal and recurrent data distribution patterns in time series datasets throughout a preliminary study. Recurrent data distribution patterns enable us to reuse previously trained models for similar distributions in the future, thus avoiding frequent unnecessary retrainings. Then, we integrated the model reuse approach into the MLOps pipeline and proposed our improved MLOps pipeline. Furthermore, we develop SimReuse, a tool to implement the new components of our MLOps pipeline to store models and reuse them for inference of data segments with similar data distributions in the future. Our evaluation results on five time series datasets demonstrate that our model reuse approach can maintain the models' performance while significantly reducing maintenance time, costs, and the number of retrainings. Our model reuse approach achieves ML model performance comparable to the best baselines, while reducing the computation time and costs to 1/8th. Therefore, industries and practitioners can benefit from our approach and use our tool to maintain their ML models' performance in the deployment phase to reduce their maintenance time and costs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2024.

Builds on

13 of 89 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
  2. 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,141
  3. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,400
  4. 2023Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Modelscited by 680
  5. 2021Darts: User-Friendly Modern Machine Learning for Time Seriescited by 90
  6. 2022From Concept Drift to Model Degradation: An Overview on Performance-Aware Drift Detectorscited by 82
  7. 2013How good is the Electricity benchmark for evaluating concept drift adaptationcited by 8
  8. 2022Towards a consistent interpretation of AIOps modelscited by 8
  9. 2022Studying the Practices of Deploying Machine Learning Projects on Dockercited by 8
  10. 2020DriftSurf: A Risk-competitive Learning Algorithm under Concept Driftcited by 3
  11. 2023On the Model Update Strategies for Supervised Learning in AIOps Solutionscited by 3
  12. 2023Is Your Anomaly Detector Ready for Change? Adapting AIOps Solutions to the Real Worldcited by 3
1 more
  1. 2023Approximation of optimization problems with constraints through kernel Sum-Of-Squarescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.