mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MAG-V: A Multi-Agent Framework for Synthetic Data Generation and Verification

arXiv 2412.04494 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2024cs.CLcited by 12

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Extending the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) with functions or tools for environment interaction has led to the emergence of the agent paradigm. In industry, training an LLM is not always feasible because of the scarcity of domain data, legal holds on proprietary customer data, rapidly changing business requirements, and the need to prototype new assistants. Agents provide an elegant solution to the above by relying on the zero-shot reasoning abilities of the underlying LLM and utilizing tools to explore and reason over customer data and respond to user requests. However, there are two concerns here: (I) acquiring large scale customer queries for agent testing is time-consuming, and (II) high reliance on the tool call sequence (or trajectory) followed by the agent to respond to user queries may lead to unexpected or incorrect behavior. To address this, we propose MAG-V, a multi-agent framework to first generate a dataset of questions that mimic customer queries; and second, reverse-engineer alternate questions from the responses for trajectory verification. Initial results indicate that our synthetic data can improve agent performance on actual customer queries. Furthermore, our trajectory verification methodology, inspired by distant supervision and using traditional machine learning (ML) models, outperforms a GPT-4o judge baseline by 11% accuracy and matches the performance of a GPT-4 judge on our constructed dataset. Overall, our approach is a step towards unifying diverse task agents into a cohesive framework for achieving an aligned objective.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2024.

Builds on

28 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Synthetic Dialogue Dataset Generation using LLM Agents30 Jan
  2. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey14 Sep
  3. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents22 Aug

Other references · 25

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  4. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  5. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  6. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  7. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  8. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  9. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  10. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  11. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
  12. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
13 more
  1. 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
  2. 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 397
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 304
  4. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 241
  5. 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 240
  6. 2023An Empirical Study of the Non-determinism of ChatGPT in Code Generationcited by 134
  7. 2023T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Stepcited by 91
  8. 2024AgentInstruct: Toward Generative Teaching with Agentic Flowscited by 88
  9. 2023ChatGPT for Vulnerability Detection, Classification, and Repair: How Far Are We?cited by 44
  10. 2018Robust Distant Supervision Relation Extraction via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  11. 2024How Susceptible are LLMs to Influence in Prompts?cited by 32
  12. 2024Reverse Question Answering: Can an LLM Write a Question so Hard (or Bad) that it Can't Answer?cited by 13
  13. 2024The Fellowship of the LLMs: Multi-Model Workflows for Synthetic Preference Optimization Dataset Generationcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 4.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026State-Grounded Multi-Agent Synthetic Data Generation for Tool-Augmented LLMs
  2. 2026AgentSim: A Platform for Verifiable Agent-Trace Simulation
  3. 2025Towards Reliable Multi-Agent Systems for Marketing Applications via Reflection, Memory, and Planning
  4. 2026ProductResearch: Training E-Commerce Deep Research Agents via Multi-Agent Synthetic Trajectory Distillation
  5. 2026LLM Agents Factory: Retrieval of Domain-Specific LLM Agents
  6. 2026A Tri-Agent Framework for Evaluating and Aligning Question Clarification Capabilities of Large Language Models
  7. 2026Agent Gym: A Framework for Continuous Evaluation and Evolution of LLM Agents Through Human-in-the-Loop Feedback
  8. 2026DynamicMCPBench: A Trace-Grounded, Effect-Scored Benchmark for LLM Agents over Live MCP Servers