Can neural operators always be continuously discretized?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of discretization of neural operators between Hilbert spaces in a general framework including skip connections. We focus on bijective neural operators through the lens of diffeomorphisms in infinite dimensions. Framed using category theory, we give a no-go theorem that shows that diffeomorphisms between Hilbert spaces or Hilbert manifolds may not admit any continuous approximations by diffeomorphisms on finite-dimensional spaces, even if the approximations are nonlinear. The natural way out is the introduction of strongly monotone diffeomorphisms and layerwise strongly monotone neural operators which have continuous approximations by strongly monotone diffeomorphisms on finite-dimensional spaces. For these, one can guarantee discretization invariance, while ensuring that finite-dimensional approximations converge not only as sequences of functions, but that their representations converge in a suitable sense as well. Finally, we show that bilipschitz neural operators may always be written in the form of an alternating composition of strongly monotone neural operators, plus a simple isometry. Thus we realize a rigorous platform for discretization of a generalization of a neural operator. We also show that neural operators of this type may be approximated through the composition of finite-rank residual neural operators, where each block is strongly monotone, and may be inverted locally via iteration. We conclude by providing a quantitative approximation result for the discretization of general bilipschitz neural operators.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2024.
Builds on
19 of 54 references.
References · 19
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 567
- 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 416
- 2020Model Reduction and Neural Networks for Parametric PDEscited by 257
- 2017The Reversible Residual Network: Backpropagation Without Storing Activationscited by 215
- 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 211
- 2020Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systemscited by 160
- 2022Physics-Informed Deep Neural Operator Networkscited by 110
- 2019Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU neural networks in Ws,p normscited by 95
- 2019Deep Neural Network Approximation Theorycited by 92
- 2020Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximatorscited by 85
- 2022Diffusion Generative Models in Infinite Dimensionscited by 49
7 more
- 2022Universal approximation property of invertible neural networkscited by 30
- 2020Non-Euclidean Universal Approximationcited by 29
- 2020Globally Injective ReLU Networkscited by 23
- 2024Discretization Error of Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 20
- 2020Approximations with deep neural networks in Sobolev time-spacecited by 13
- 2023Globally injective and bijective neural operatorscited by 13
- 2022Continuous Generative Neural Networks: A Wavelet-Based Architecture in Function Spacescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.