mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RoboMD: Uncovering Robot Vulnerabilities through Semantic Potential Fields

arXiv 2412.02818 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2024cs.RO cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robot manipulation policies, while central to the promise of physical AI, are highly vulnerable in the presence of external variations in the real world. Diagnosing these vulnerabilities is hindered by two key challenges: (i) the relevant variations to test against are often unknown, and (ii) direct testing in the real world is costly and unsafe. We introduce a framework that tackles both issues by learning a separate deep reinforcement learning (deep RL) policy for vulnerability prediction through virtual runs on a continuous vision-language embedding trained with limited success-failure data. By treating this embedding space, which is rich in semantic and visual variations, as a potential field, the policy learns to move toward vulnerable regions while being repelled from success regions. This vulnerability prediction policy, trained on virtual rollouts, enables scalable and safe vulnerability analysis without expensive physical trials. By querying this policy, our framework builds a probabilistic vulnerability-likelihood map. Experiments across simulation benchmarks and a physical robot arm show that our framework uncovers up to 23% more unique vulnerabilities than state-of-the-art vision-language baselines, revealing subtle vulnerabilities overlooked by heuristic testing. Additionally, we show that fine-tuning the manipulation policy with the vulnerabilities discovered by our framework improves manipulation performance with much less fine-tuning data.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.

Builds on

38 of 52 references.

References · 38

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  5. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  6. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
  7. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  8. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
  9. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  10. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,007
  11. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  12. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
26 more
  1. 2021What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulationcited by 699
  2. 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
  3. 2023MimicGen: A Data Generation System for Scalable Robot Learning using Human Demonstrationscited by 308
  4. 2020TEASER: Fast and Certifiable Point Cloud Registrationcited by 274
  5. 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 171
  6. 2024Data Scaling Laws in Imitation Learning for Robotic Manipulationcited by 144
  7. 2024THE COLOSSEUM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generalization for Robotic Manipulationcited by 128
  8. 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 118
  9. 2020Learning to Generalize Across Long-Horizon Tasks from Human Demonstrationscited by 114
  10. 2024Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language Modelscited by 83
  11. 2023Decomposing the Generalization Gap in Imitation Learning for Visual Robotic Manipulationcited by 78
  12. 2020Safe Imitation Learning via Fast Bayesian Reward Inference from Preferencescited by 73
  13. 2020A Survey of Algorithms for Black-Box Safety Validation of Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 71
  14. 2024Unpacking Failure Modes of Generative Policies: Runtime Monitoring of Consistency and Progresscited by 63
  15. 2020Out-of-Distribution Detection for Automotive Perceptioncited by 37
  16. 2023On the Importance of Exploration for Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  17. 2022Failure Prediction with Statistical Guarantees for Vision-Based Robot Controlcited by 21
  18. 2021Distributionally Robust Policy Learning via Adversarial Environment Generationcited by 17
  19. 2022How Do We Fail? Stress Testing Perception in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 17
  20. 2022Modularity through Attention: Efficient Training and Transfer of Language-Conditioned Policies for Robot Manipulationcited by 12
  21. 2024The Role of Predictive Uncertainty and Diversity in Embodied AI and Robot Learningcited by 11
  22. 2024Failures Are Fated, But Can Be Faded: Characterizing and Mitigating Unwanted Behaviors in Large-Scale Vision and Language Modelscited by 11
  23. 2013Minimum-violation LTL Planning with Conflicting Specificationscited by 7
  24. 2024Human-AI Safety: A Descendant of Generative AI and Control Systems Safetycited by 7
  25. 2024DECIDER: Leveraging Foundation Model Priors for Improved Model Failure Detection and Explanationcited by 6
  26. 2024Concept: Dynamic Risk Assessment for AI-Controlled Robotic Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.