mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainable CTR Prediction via LLM Reasoning

arXiv 2412.02588 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2024cs.IR cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → LLM reasoning for recommendation

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommendation Systems have become integral to modern user experiences, but lack transparency in their decision-making processes. Existing explainable recommendation methods are hindered by reliance on a post-hoc paradigm, wherein explanation generators are trained independently of the underlying recommender models. This paradigm necessitates substantial human effort in data construction and raises concerns about explanation reliability. In this paper, we present ExpCTR, a novel framework that integrates large language model based explanation generation directly into the CTR prediction process. Inspired by recent advances in reinforcement learning, we employ two carefully designed reward mechanisms, LC alignment, which ensures explanations reflect user intentions, and IC alignment, which maintains consistency with traditional ID-based CTR models. Our approach incorporates an efficient training paradigm with LoRA and a three-stage iterative process. ExpCTR circumvents the need for extensive explanation datasets while fostering synergy between CTR prediction and explanation generation. Experimental results demonstrate that ExpCTR significantly enhances both recommendation accuracy and interpretability across three real-world datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM reasoning for recommendation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.

Builds on

15 of 49 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  5. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
  6. 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
  7. 2023Chat-REC: Towards Interactive and Explainable LLMs-Augmented Recommender Systemcited by 241
  8. 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
  9. 2023Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 202
  10. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Recommender? A Preliminary Studycited by 192
  11. 2021Personalized Transformer for Explainable Recommendationcited by 58
  12. 2023A Comparative Study of Open-Source Large Language Models, GPT-4 and Claude 2: Multiple-Choice Test Taking in Nephrologycited by 26
3 more
  1. 2023RecExplainer: Aligning Large Language Models for Explaining Recommendation Modelscited by 14
  2. 2024RA-Rec: An Efficient ID Representation Alignment Framework for LLM-based Recommendationcited by 7
  3. 2024Break the ID-Language Barrier: An Adaption Framework for LLM-based Sequential Recommendationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024ReasoningRec: Bridging Personalized Recommendations and Human-Interpretable Explanations through LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025Explainable Recommendation with Simulated Human Feedback
  3. 2026Sequence-aware Large Language Models for Explainable Recommendation ↗
  4. 2026Reasoning-guided Collaborative Filtering with Language Models for Explainable Recommendation
  5. 2025Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation
  6. 2025R2ec: Towards Large Recommender Models with Reasoning
  7. 2026RobustExplain: Evaluating Robustness of LLM-Based Explanation Agents for Recommendation
  8. 2025Shielded RecRL: Explanation Generation for Recommender Systems without Ranking Degradation