Vector Optimization with Gaussian Process Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study black-box vector optimization with Gaussian process bandits, where there is an incomplete order relation on objective vectors described by a polyhedral convex cone. Existing black-box vector optimization approaches either suffer from high sample complexity or lack theoretical guarantees. We propose Vector Optimization with Gaussian Process (VOGP), an adaptive elimination algorithm that identifies Pareto optimal solutions sample efficiently by exploiting the smoothness of the objective function. We establish theoretical guarantees, deriving information gain-based and kernel-specific sample complexity bounds. Finally, we conduct a thorough empirical evaluation of VOGP and compare it with the state-of-the-art multi-objective and vector optimization algorithms on several real-world and synthetic datasets, emphasizing VOGP's efficiency (e.g., ~18× lower sample complexity on average). We also provide heuristic adaptations of VOGP for cases where the design space is continuous and where the Gaussian process model lacks access to the true kernel hyperparameters. This work opens a new frontier in sample-efficient multi-objective black-box optimization by incorporating preference structures while maintaining theoretical guarantees and practical efficiency.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.
Builds on
22 of 80 references.
References · 22
- 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
- 2017A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problemscited by 178
- 2020On Information Gain and Regret Bounds in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 156
- 2015Predictive Entropy Search for Multi-objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 88
- 2020Max-value Entropy Search for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Constraintscited by 81
- 2019Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization using Pareto-frontier Entropycited by 57
- 2019No-Regret Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Hyperparameterscited by 50
- 2021Practical and Rigorous Uncertainty Bounds for Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 49
- 2022Joint Entropy Search for Multi-objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 45
- 2022Preference Exploration for Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Multiple Outcomescited by 41
- 2013Multiobjective optimization using Gaussian process emulators via stepwise uncertainty reductioncited by 21
- 2019Multi-Attribute Bayesian Optimization With Interactive Preference Learningcited by 21
10 more
- 2019Multi-objective Bayesian optimisation with preferences over objectivescited by 16
- 2022Safe Active Learning for Multi-Output Gaussian Processescited by 13
- 2022Fair and Green Hyperparameter Optimization via Multi-objective and Multiple Information Source Bayesian Optimizationcited by 13
- 2020Learning Inconsistent Preferences with Gaussian Processescited by 11
- 2021Vector Optimization with Stochastic Bandit Feedbackcited by 10
- 2024Bayesian Optimisation with Unknown Hyperparameters: Regret Bounds Logarithmically Closer to Optimalcited by 6
- 2023Preference-Aware Constrained Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 4
- 2014Set optimization - a rather short introductioncited by 3
- 2021On Preference Learning Based on Sequential Bayesian Optimization with Pairwise Comparisoncited by 3
- 2022Bayesian multi-objective optimization for stochastic simulators: an extension of the Pareto Active Learning methodcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.