mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Intermediate Outputs Are More Sensitive Than You Think

arXiv 2412.00696 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2024cs.CV cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing reliance on deep computer vision models that process sensitive data has raised significant privacy concerns, particularly regarding the exposure of intermediate results in hidden layers. While traditional privacy risk assessment techniques focus on protecting overall model outputs, they often overlook vulnerabilities within these intermediate representations. Current privacy risk assessment techniques typically rely on specific attack simulations to assess risk, which can be computationally expensive and incomplete. This paper introduces a novel approach to measuring privacy risks in deep computer vision models based on the Degrees of Freedom (DoF) and sensitivity of intermediate outputs, without requiring adversarial attack simulations. We propose a framework that leverages DoF to evaluate the amount of information retained in each layer and combines this with the rank of the Jacobian matrix to assess sensitivity to input variations. This dual analysis enables systematic measurement of privacy risks at various model layers. Our experimental validation on real-world datasets demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach in providing deeper insights into privacy risks associated with intermediate representations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2024.

Builds on

19 of 45 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  3. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
  4. 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 766
  5. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
  6. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  7. 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
  8. 2021Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 248
  9. 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
  10. 2019Robust Learning with Jacobian Regularizationcited by 129
  11. 2017Towards a Visual Privacy Advisor: Understanding and Predicting Privacy Risks in Imagescited by 101
  12. 2021Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Priorcited by 101
7 more
  1. 2020Provable Defense against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning from Representation Perspectivecited by 94
  2. 2018Knowledge Transfer with Jacobian Matchingcited by 76
  3. 2020Privacy in Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 71
  4. 2022GradViT: Gradient Inversion of Vision Transformerscited by 53
  5. 2016Optimality of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemmacited by 42
  6. 2022A Survey on Gradient Inversion: Attacks, Defenses and Future Directionscited by 40
  7. 2021k-Anonymity in Practice: How Generalisation and Suppression Affect Machine Learning Classifierscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.