LAMBDA: Covering the Multimodal Critical Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems by Search Space Quantization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scenario-based virtual testing is one of the most significant methods to test and evaluate the safety of automated driving systems (ADSs). However, it is impractical to enumerate all concrete scenarios in a logical scenario space and test them exhaustively. Recently, Black-Box Optimization (BBO) was introduced to accelerate the scenario-based test of ADSs by utilizing the historical test information to generate new test cases. However, a single optimum found by the BBO algorithm is insufficient for the purpose of a comprehensive safety evaluation of ADSs in a logical scenario. In fact, all the subspaces representing danger in the logical scenario space, rather than only the most critical concrete scenario, play a more significant role for the safety evaluation. Covering as many of the critical concrete scenarios in a logical scenario space through a limited number of tests is defined as the Black-Box Coverage (BBC) problem in this paper. We formalized this problem in a sample-based search paradigm and constructed a coverage criterion with Confusion Matrix Analysis. Furthermore, we propose LAMBDA (Latent-Action Monte-Carlo Beam Search with Density Adaption) to solve BBC problems. LAMBDA can quickly focus on critical subspaces by recursively partitioning the logical scenario space into accepted and rejected parts. Compared with its predecessor LaMCTS, LAMBDA introduces sampling density to overcome the sampling bias from optimization and Beam Search to obtain more parallelizability. Experimental results show that LAMBDA achieves state-of-the-art performance among all baselines and can reach at most 33 and 6000 times faster than Random Search to get 95% coverage of the critical areas in 2- and 5-dimensional synthetic functions, respectively. Experiments also demonstrate that LAMBDA has a promising future in the safety evaluation of ADSs in virtual tests.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2024.
Builds on
15 of 54 references.
References · 15
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
- 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 420
- 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 359
- 2019BANANAS: Bayesian Optimization with Neural Architectures for Neural Architecture Searchcited by 175
- 2022A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation -- A Methodological Perspectivecited by 100
- 2020Learning Search Space Partition for Black-box Optimization using Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 87
- 2019Adaptive Stress Testing for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 70
- 2020Multimodal Safety-Critical Scenarios Generation for Decision-Making Algorithms Evaluationcited by 54
- 2018Scenarios for Development, Test and Validation of Automated Vehiclescited by 45
- 2020Adversarial Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles in Lane-Change Scenarioscited by 42
- 2021CausalAF: Causal Autoregressive Flow for Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generationcited by 20
3 more
- 2022Adaptive Safety Evaluation for Connected and Automated Vehicles with Sparse Control Variatescited by 8
- 2019Performance Boundary Identification for the Evaluation of Automated Vehicles using Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 5
- 2022An adaptive multi-fidelity sampling framework for safety analysis of connected and automated vehiclescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.