mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sensitive Content Classification in Social Media: A Holistic Resource and Evaluation

arXiv 2411.19832 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2024cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The detection of sensitive content in large datasets is crucial for ensuring that shared and analysed data is free from harmful material. However, current moderation tools, such as external APIs, suffer from limitations in customisation, accuracy across diverse sensitive categories, and privacy concerns. Additionally, existing datasets and open-source models focus predominantly on toxic language, leaving gaps in detecting other sensitive categories such as substance abuse or self-harm. In this paper, we put forward a unified dataset tailored for social media content moderation across six sensitive categories: conflictual language, profanity, sexually explicit material, drug-related content, self-harm, and spam. By collecting and annotating data with consistent retrieval strategies and guidelines, we address the shortcomings of previous focalised research. Our analysis demonstrates that fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on this novel dataset yields significant improvements in detection performance compared to open off-the-shelf models such as LLaMA, and even proprietary OpenAI models, which underperform by 10-15% overall. This limitation is even more pronounced on popular moderation APIs, which cannot be easily tailored to specific sensitive content categories, among others.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2024.

Builds on

16 of 71 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  4. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
  5. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 689
  6. 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
  7. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 270
  8. 2023From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacycited by 143
  9. 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 140
  10. 2022TimeLMs: Diachronic Language Models from Twittercited by 131
  11. 2021On Releasing Annotator-Level Labels and Information in Datasetscited by 126
  12. 2024Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommonscited by 62
4 more
  1. 2024The Perspectivist Paradigm Shift: Assumptions and Challenges of Capturing Human Labelscited by 38
  2. 2021Detecting Harmful Content On Online Platforms: What Platforms Need Vs. Where Research Efforts Gocited by 33
  3. 2021A Framework of Severity for Harmful Content Onlinecited by 23
  4. 2021Security and Privacy for Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challengescited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.