mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automated Literature Review Using NLP Techniques and LLM-Based Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv 2411.18583 ↗First posted 27 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 8

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

This research presents and compares multiple approaches to automate the generation of literature reviews using several Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with a Large Language Model (LLM). The ever-increasing number of research articles provides a huge challenge for manual literature review. It has resulted in an increased demand for automation. Developing a system capable of automatically generating the literature reviews from only the PDF files as input is the primary objective of this research work. The effectiveness of several Natural Language Processing (NLP) strategies, such as the frequency-based method (spaCy), the transformer model (Simple T5), and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with Large Language Model (GPT-3.5-turbo), is evaluated to meet the primary objective. The SciTLDR dataset is chosen for this research experiment and three distinct techniques are utilized to implement three different systems for auto-generating the literature reviews. The ROUGE scores are used for the evaluation of all three systems. Based on the evaluation, the Large Language Model GPT-3.5-turbo achieved the highest ROUGE-1 score, 0.364. The transformer model comes in second place and spaCy is at the last position. Finally, a graphical user interface is created for the best system based on the large language model.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 3 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2024.

Builds on

3 of 16 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020TLDR: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documentscited by 136
  2. 2021Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?cited by 63
  3. 2024Automating Research Synthesis with Domain-Specific Large Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024LitLLM: A Toolkit for Scientific Literature Review
  2. 2025Can Large Language Models Be Trusted Paper Reviewers? A Feasibility Study
  3. 2025AutoSurvey2: Empowering Researchers with Next Level Automated Literature Surveys
  4. 2024Developing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based LLM Systems from PDFs: An Experience Report
  5. 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
  6. 2024Empowering Meta-Analysis: Leveraging Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesis
  7. 2026Large language models for post-publication research evaluation: Evidence from expert recommendations and citation indicators
  8. 2025SurveyGen: Quality-Aware Scientific Survey Generation with Large Language Models