Simulating Tabular Datasets through LLMs to Rapidly Explore Hypotheses about Real-World Entities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Do horror writers have worse childhoods than other writers? Though biographical details are known about many writers, quantitatively exploring such a qualitative hypothesis requires significant human effort, e.g. to sift through many biographies and interviews of writers and to iteratively search for quantitative features that reflect what is qualitatively of interest. This paper explores the potential to quickly prototype these kinds of hypotheses through (1) applying LLMs to estimate properties of concrete entities like specific people, companies, books, kinds of animals, and countries; (2) performing off-the-shelf analysis methods to reveal possible relationships among such properties (e.g. linear regression); and towards further automation, (3) applying LLMs to suggest the quantitative properties themselves that could help ground a particular qualitative hypothesis (e.g. number of adverse childhood events, in the context of the running example). The hope is to allow sifting through hypotheses more quickly through collaboration between human and machine. Our experiments highlight that indeed, LLMs can serve as useful estimators of tabular data about specific entities across a range of domains, and that such estimations improve with model scale. Further, initial experiments demonstrate the potential of LLMs to map a qualitative hypothesis of interest to relevant concrete variables that the LLM can then estimate. The conclusion is that LLMs offer intriguing potential to help illuminate scientifically interesting patterns latent within the internet-scale data they are trained upon.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2024.
Builds on
9 of 32 references.
References · 9
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 752
- 2023Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentationcited by 147
- 2023Machine Learning for Synthetic Data Generation: A Reviewcited by 120
- 2022Language Models that Seek for Knowledge: Modular Search & Generation for Dialogue and Prompt Completioncited by 102
- 2023Crawling the Internal Knowledge-Base of Language Modelscited by 85
- 2023Unlocking the Potential of User Feedback: Leveraging Large Language Model as User Simulator to Enhance Dialogue Systemcited by 32
- 2024Literature Meets Data: A Synergistic Approach to Hypothesis Generationcited by 20
- 2024Automating psychological hypothesis generation with AI: when large language models meet causal graphcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.